ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2020
Comparison Between Linked Color Imaging and Blue Laser Imaging for Improving the Visibility of Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Multicenter Pilot Study.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of image-enhanced endoscopy for colorectal polyp detection.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Texture and Color Enhanced Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colonic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Improvement of Colonoscopic Image Quality Using a New LED Endoscopic System with Specialized Noise Reduction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Linked color imaging for the detection and treatment of serrated colon neoplasia: current status and future perspective.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Investigation of the relationship between colonoscopy insertion difficulty factors and endoscope shape using an endoscopic position detection unit.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
- Non-polypoid Colorectal Lesions Detection and False Positive Detection by Artificial Intelligence under Blue Laser Imaging and Linked Color Imaging.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2024Article
- Detailed Superiority of the CAD EYE Artificial Intelligence System over Endoscopists for Lesion Detection and Characterization Using Unique Movie Sets.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2024Article
- Usefulness of AI-Equipped Endoscopy for Detecting Colorectal Adenoma during Colonoscopy Screening: Confirm That Colon Neoplasm Finely Can Be Identified by AI without Overlooking Study (Confidential Study).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of LED and LASER Colonoscopy About Linked Color Imaging and Blue Laser/Light Imaging of Colorectal Tumors in a Multinational Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Detecting colorectal lesions with image-enhanced endoscopy: an updated review from clinical trials.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Usefulness of Acetic Acid Spray with Narrow-Band Imaging for Identifying the Margin of Sessile Serrated Lesions.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Linked Color Imaging for Stomach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Review
- Mucosal imaging in colon polyps: New advances and what the future may hold.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Analysis of Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging for Improving the Visibility of Non-polypoid Colorectal Lesions.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Article
- Detection of colorectal lesions during colonoscopy.DEN open · 2022Review
- Image-Enhanced Capsule Endoscopy Improves the Identification of Small Intestinal Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- An analysis about the function of a new artificial intelligence, CAD EYE with the lesion recognition and diagnosis for colorectal polyps in clinical practice.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLinked color imaging (LCI) and blue laser imaging-bright (BLI-b) improve the visibility of gastrointestinal lesions. In this multicenter study, we compared the effects of LCI and BLI-b on the visibility of flat polyps with visibility scores and color difference (CD) values, including fast-withdrawal and large-monitor observation.
methodsWe recorded 120 videos of 40 consecutive flat polyps (2-20 mm), adenoma, and sessile serrated adenoma and polyp (SSA/P), using white light imaging (WLI), BLI-b, and LCI from July 2017 to December 2017. All videos were evaluated by eight endoscopists according to a published polyp visibility score of 4 (excellent) to 1 (poor). Additionally, 1.5 ×faster and 1.7 ×sized videos were evaluated. Moreover, we calculated the CD values for each polyp in three modes.
resultsThe mean LCI scores (3.1 ± 0.9) were significantly higher than the WLI scores (2.5 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) but not significantly higher than the BLI-b scores (3.0 ± 1.0). The scores of faster videos on LCI (3.0 ± 1.1) were significantly higher than WLI (2.0 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) and BLI-b (2.8 ± 1.1, p = 0.03). The scores of larger-sized videos on LCI were not significantly higher than those of WLI or BLI-b. The CD value of LCI (18.0 ± 7.7) was higher than that of WLI (11.7 ± 7.0, p < 0.001), but was not significantly higher than that of BLI-b (16.6 ± 9.6). The CD value of LCI was significantly higher than that of BLI-b for adenoma, but the CD value of BLI-b was significantly higher than that of LCI for SSA/P.
conclusionsThe superiority of LCI to BLI-b was proven for the visibility of adenoma and fast observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31728789What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.