Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728740›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2019

Evolutionary engineering and molecular characterization of a caffeine-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain.

Yusuf Sürmeli, Can Holyavkin, Alican Topaloğlu, Mevlüt Arslan, Halil İbrahim Kısakesen, Zeynep Petek Çakar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Experimental evolution ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. FromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Tyrosol induces multiple drug resistance in yeastFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nutrients · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuf SürmeliDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science & Letters, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey.
Can HolyavkinDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science & Letters, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey.
Alican TopaloğluDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science & Letters, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mevlüt ArslanDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science & Letters, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey.
Halil İbrahim KısakesenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science & Letters, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zeynep Petek ÇakarDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science & Letters, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey. cakarp@itu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2278-3670
Istanbul Technical University · TRTekirdağ Namık Kemal University · TRVan Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caffeine is a naturally occurring alkaloid, where its major consumption occurs with beverages such as coffee, soft drinks and tea. Despite a variety of reports on the effects of caffeine on diverse organisms including yeast, the complex molecular basis of caffeine resistance and response has yet to be understood. In this study, a caffeine-hyperresistant and genetically stable Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant was obtained for the first time by evolutionary engineering, using batch selection in the presence of gradually increased caffeine stress levels and without any mutagenesis of the initial population prior to selection. The selected mutant could resist up to 50 mM caffeine, a level, to our knowledge, that has not been reported for S. cerevisiae so far. The mutant was also resistant to the cell wall-damaging agent lyticase, and it showed cross-resistance against various compounds such as rapamycin, antimycin, coniferyl aldehyde and cycloheximide. Comparative transcriptomic analysis results revealed that the genes involved in the energy conservation and production pathways, and pleiotropic drug resistance were overexpressed. Whole genome re-sequencing identified single nucleotide polymorphisms in only three genes of the caffeine-hyperresistant mutant; PDR1, PDR5 and RIM8, which may play a potential role in caffeine-hyperresistance.

Indexed as

AcroleinAntimycin AATP-Binding Cassette TransportersCaffeineCell Cycle ProteinsCycloheximideDNA-Binding ProteinsDrug Resistance, FungalMutagenesisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProtein EngineeringSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSirolimusStress, PhysiologicalTranscription FactorsAcroleinantimycinAntimycin AATP-Binding Cassette TransportersCaffeineCell Cycle ProteinsconiferaldehydeCycloheximideDNA-Binding ProteinsPDR1 protein, S cerevisiaePDR5 protein, S cerevisiaeRim8 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSirolimusTranscription FactorsAdaptive laboratory evolutionCaffeineEvolutionary engineeringPleiotropic drug resistance (PDR)Saccharomyces cerevisiaeStress resistance

Identifiers

PMID31728740
OpenAlexW2983181581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.