Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728697›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2020

Evaluation of eazyplex

Alicja Sękowska, Tomasz Bogiel, Eugenia Gospodarek-Komkowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rapid commercial CTX-M diagnostics: Performance, limitations and clinical impact.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. HypervirulentPathogens & immunity · 2024
    Review
  3. Screening ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. The Evaluation of EazyplexAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Detection of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alicja SękowskaDepartment of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 9 M. Sklodowska-Curie Street, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland. asekowska@cm.umk.pl.
Tomasz BogielDepartment of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 9 M. Sklodowska-Curie Street, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Eugenia Gospodarek-KomkowskaDepartment of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 9 M. Sklodowska-Curie Street, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multi-drug resistance of Gram-negative rods is one of the most important issues of present medicine. In recent years, more and more strains resistant to the majority or to all possible therapeutic options have been isolated-especially Klebsiella spp. and Pseudomonas spp. representatives. It is very important to detect strains with these phenotypes as quickly and reliably as possible. The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of eazyplex

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesKlebsiellaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymerase Chain ReactionPseudomonasPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID31728697
PMCPMC6946722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.