Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728652›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2019

Structure and variation of root-associated microbiomes of potato grown in alfisol.

Ayslu Mardanova, Marat Lutfullin, Guzel Hadieva, Yaw Akosah, Daria Pudova, Daniil Kabanov, Elena Shagimardanova, Petr Vankov, Semyon Vologin, Natalia Gogoleva and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Temporal heterogeneity of the root microbiome inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Induced Expression ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ayslu MardanovaLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia. mardanovaayslu@mail.ru.
Marat LutfullinLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Guzel HadievaLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Yaw AkosahLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Daria PudovaLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Daniil KabanovLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Elena ShagimardanovaLaboratory of Extreme Biology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Petr VankovLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Semyon VologinTatar Research Institute of Agriculture, Kazan Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.
Natalia GogolevaLaboratory of Extreme Biology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Zenon StasevskiTatar Research Institute of Agriculture, Kazan Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.
Margarita SharipovaLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Kazan Federal University · RUA.E. Arbuzov Institute of Organic and Physical Chemistry · RUKazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics · RUTatar Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture · RU

Funding

Basic scientific researchof the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation АААА-А18-118031390148-1Российский Фонд Фундаментальных Исследований (РФФИ) 16-16-04062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root-associated fungi and bacteria play a pivotal role in the plant-soil ecosystem by influencing both plant growth and immunity. The aim of this study was to unravel the biodiversity of the bacterial and fungal rhizosphere (RS) and rhizoplane (RP) microbiota of Zhukovskij rannij potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivar growing in the Alfisol of Tatarstan, Russia. To assess the structure and diversity of microbial communities, we employed the 16S rRNA and internal transcribed spacer gene library technique. Overall, sequence analysis showed the presence of 3982 bacterial and 188 fungal operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the RP, and 6018 bacterial and 320 fungal OTUs for in the RS. Comparison between microbial community structures in the RS and RP showed significant differences between these compartments. Biodiversity was higher in the RS than in the RP. Although members of Proteobacteria (RS-59.1 ± 4.9%; RP-54.5 ± 9.2%), Bacteroidetes (RS-23.19 ± 10.2%; RP-34.52 ± 10.4%) and Actinobacteria (RS-11.55 ± 4.9%; RP-7.7 ± 5.1%) were the three most dominant phyla, accounting for 94-98% of all bacterial taxa in both compartments, notable variations were observed in the primary dominance of classes and genera in RS and RP samples. In addition, our results demonstrated that the potato rhizoplane was significantly enriched with the genera Flavobacterium, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter and other potentially beneficial bacteria. The fungal community was predominantly inhabited by members of the Ascomycota phylum (RS-81.4 ± 8.1%; RP-81.7 ± 5.7%), among which the genera Fusarium (RS-10.34 ± 3.41%; RP-9.96 ± 4.79%), Monographella (RS-7.66 ± 4.43%; RP-9.91 ± 5.87%), Verticillium (RS-4.6 ± 1.43%; RP-8.27 ± 3.63%) and Chaetomium (RS-4.95 ± 2.07%; RP-8.33 ± 4.93%) were particularly abundant. Interestingly, potato rhizoplane was significantly enriched with potentially useful fungal genera, such as Mortierella and Metacordiceps. A comparative analysis revealed that the abundance of Fusarium (a cosmopolitan plant pathogen) varied significantly depending on rotation variants, indicating a possible control of phytopathogenic fungi via management-induced shifts through crop rotational methods. Analysis of the core microbiome of bacterial and fungal community structure showed that the formation of bacterial microbiota in the rhizosphere and rhizoplane is dependent on the host plant.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBacteriaFungiMicrobiotaPhylogenyPlant DevelopmentPlant RootsRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRussiaSoilSoil MicrobiologySolanum tuberosumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilIllumina amplicon sequencingMicrobial diversityMicrobiotaPotatoRhizoplaneRhizosphere

Identifiers

PMID31728652
OpenAlexW2983359973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.