ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2019
Development and characterization of a suturable biomimetic patch for cardiac applications.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine in Italy: Brief State of the Art of the Principal Research Centers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Polymeric Biomaterials for the Treatment of Cardiac Post-Infarction Injuries.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Preparation and characterization of gelatin-polysaccharide composite hydrogels for tissue engineering.PeerJ · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D scaffolds used to repair damaged tissues should be able to mimic both composition and functions of natural extracellular matrix, which is mainly composed of polysaccharides and proteins. In our previous research new biomimetic sponges, based on blends of alginate with gelatin, were produced and characterized for myocardial tissue engineering applications. It was observed that these scaffolds can potentially function as a promising cardiac extracellular matrix substitute, but a reinforcement is required to improve their suturing properties. Aim of the present work was the development of a suturable biomimetic patch by the inclusion of a synthetic mesh within an alginate/gelatin scaffold. The mesh, produced by dry spinning, was made of eight superimposed layers of polycaprolactone microfibers, each one rotated of 45° with respect to the adjacent one. Reinforced scaffolds were obtained through the use of a mold, specially designed to place the fibrous mesh exactly in the center of the sponge. Both the reinforcement mesh and the reinforced scaffold were characterized. A perfect integration between the mesh and the sponge was observed. The fibrous mesh reduced the capacity of the sponge to absorb water, but the degree of hydrophilicity of the material was still comparable with that of natural cardiac tissue. The reinforced system showed a suitable stability in aqueous environment and it resulted much more resistant to suturing than not reinforced scaffold and even than human arteries. Polycaprolactone mesh was not cytotoxic and the reinforced scaffold was able to support cardiomyocytes adhesion and proliferation. Overall, the obtained results confirmed that the choice to modify the alginate/gelatin sponges through the insertion of an appropriate reinforcement system turned out to be correct in view of their potential use in myocardial tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31728643What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.