Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728596›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Effects of arm weight support on neuromuscular activation during reaching in chronic stroke patients.

Keith D Runnalls, Pablo Ortega-Auriol, Angus J C McMorland, Greg Anson, Winston D Byblow

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keith D RunnallsMovement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Pablo Ortega-AuriolMovement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Angus J C McMorlandMovement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Greg AnsonMovement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Winston D ByblowMovement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. w.byblow@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8347-6730
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand 14/136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better understand how arm weight support (WS) can be used to alleviate upper limb impairment after stroke, we investigated the effects of WS on muscle activity, muscle synergy expression, and corticomotor excitability (CME) in 13 chronic stroke patients and 6 age-similar healthy controls. For patients, lesion location and corticospinal tract integrity were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging. Upper limb impairment was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer upper extremity assessment with patients categorised as either mild or moderate-severe. Three levels of WS were examined: low = 0, medium = 50 and high = 100% of full support. Surface EMG was recorded from 8 upper limb muscles, and muscle synergies were decomposed using non-negative matrix factorisation from data obtained during reaching movements to an array of 14 targets using the paretic or dominant arm. Interactions between impairment level and WS were found for the number of targets hit, and EMG measures. Overall, greater WS resulted in lower EMG levels, although the degree of modulation between WS levels was less for patients with moderate-severe compared to mild impairment. Healthy controls expressed more synergies than patients with moderate-severe impairment. Healthy controls and patients with mild impairment showed more synergies with high compared to low weight support. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) to which stimulus-response curves were fitted as a measure of corticomotor excitability (CME). The effect of WS on CME varied between muscles and across impairment level. These preliminary findings demonstrate that WS has direct and indirect effects on muscle activity, synergies, and CME and warrants further study in order to reduce upper limb impairment after stroke.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArmChronic DiseaseElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalPostureSeverity of Illness IndexStrokeHumanMuscle synergyReachingStrokeTranscranial magnetic stimulationUpper limb

Identifiers

PMID31728596
OpenAlexW2988487970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.