ArticleExperimental brain research2019
Effects of repetitive passive movement on ankle joint on spinal reciprocal inhibition.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Clenching Strength on Exercise Performance: Verification Using Spinal Function Assessments.Sports healthTrial
- Modulation of Primary Afferent Nerve Fiber (Ia) Reciprocal Inhibition Under Voluntary and Electrically Stimulated Muscle Conditions: Within-Subject Study Design.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Supraspinal Activation Induced by Visual Kinesthetic Illusion Modulates Spinal Excitability.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Reciprocal inhibition of the thigh muscles in humans: A study using transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.Physiological reports · 2024Article
- Participant attention on the intervention target during repetitive passive movement improved spinal reciprocal inhibition enhancement and joint movement function.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Activation of the Supplementary Motor Areas Enhances Spinal Reciprocal Inhibition in Healthy Individuals.Brain sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Repetitive passive movement (RPM) activates afferent Ia fibers. The input of afferent Ia fibers from antagonist muscle may modulate the extent of spinal reciprocal inhibition (RI). However, effects of RPM on RI remain unknown. We aimed to clarify these effects in 20 healthy adults. Four RPM tasks (40°/s, 80°/s, 120°/s, and 160°/s), with the range of ankle joint movement set to 40°, ranging from 10° in dorsiflexion to 30° in plantar flexion, were performed for 10 min. For measuring RI, a deep peroneal nerve as a conditioning stimulus, tibial nerve as a test stimulus, and three condition-test stimulus intervals (CTIs; single, 2 ms, and 20 ms) were used. The stimulation frequency was 0.3 Hz for 36 times (3 stimulation conditions × 12 sets). RI was measured before, immediately after, and 5, 10, 15, and 20 min (Pre, Post 5, 10, 15, and 20, respectively) after the task. The extent of reciprocal Ia inhibition (CTI 2 ms) significantly increased in Post 5 and 10 at RPM speed of ≥ 120°/s. The extent of D1 inhibition (CTI 20 ms) significantly increased in Post 5 and 10 at RPM speed of ≥ 80°/s, and continued to increase until Post 15 at RPM speed of 160°/s. The extent of RI was the highest at RPM speed of 160°/s for both Ia and D1. Therefore, high RPM may increase the extent of reciprocal Ia inhibition and D1 inhibition, suggesting that rapid movements affect RI by increasing the firing frequency from the muscle spindle to afferent Ia fibers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.