Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728573›Full record

ArticleHNO2020

[Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms].

C Dörfler, T Hocke, A Hast, U Hoppe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C DörflerAudiologische Abteilung und CI Centrum CICERO Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
T HockeCochlear Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Hannover, Deutschland.
A HastAudiologische Abteilung und CI Centrum CICERO Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
U HoppeAudiologische Abteilung und CI Centrum CICERO Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. Ulrich.Hoppe@uk-erlangen.de.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImprovement of speech perception in quiet is an important goal of hearing aid provision. In practice, results are highly variable. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between type and extent of hearing loss (audiogram type), maximum word recognition score, and aided speech perception. MATERIALS AND

methodsPure tone and speech audiometric data of 740 ears in 370 patients were reviewed. All subjects visited our hearing center for hearing aid evaluation between 2012 and 2017. The maximum word recognition score (WRS

resultsThe WRS

conclusionThe expectation regarding hearing aid provision has to be adjusted according to maximum word recognition score, the derived quality measures, degree of hearing loss, and audiogram type.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsHearing LossHearing Loss, SensorineuralSpeech PerceptionAudiometry, Pure-ToneAudiometry, SpeechHumansSpeechIEC 60118-15Maximum word recognition scoreSpeech audiometrySpeech comprehensibilityTone audiometry

Identifiers

PMID31728573
OpenAlexW3013509691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.