Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728527›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

Epigenetic reader complexes of the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum.

Wieteke Anna Maria Hoeijmakers, Jun Miao, Sabine Schmidt, Christa Geeke Toenhake, Sony Shrestha, Jeron Venhuizen, Rob Henderson, Jakob Birnbaum, Sonja Ghidelli-Disse, Gerard Drewes and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. eLife · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. ThemSphere · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. AeLife · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Wieteke Anna Maria HoeijmakersDepartment of Molecular Biology, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6525 GA, the Netherlands.
Jun MiaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Sabine SchmidtMolecular Biology and Immunology Section, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg D-20359, Germany.
Christa Geeke ToenhakeDepartment of Molecular Biology, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6525 GA, the Netherlands.
Sony ShresthaDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Jeron VenhuizenDepartment of Molecular Biology, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6525 GA, the Netherlands.
Rob HendersonDepartment of Molecular Biology, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6525 GA, the Netherlands.
Jakob BirnbaumMolecular Biology and Immunology Section, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg D-20359, Germany.
Sonja Ghidelli-DisseCellzome GmbH, a GlaxoSmithKline Company, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Gerard DrewesCellzome GmbH, a GlaxoSmithKline Company, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Liwang CuiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Hendrik Gerard StunnenbergDepartment of Molecular Biology, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6525 GA, the Netherlands.
Tobias SpielmannMolecular Biology and Immunology Section, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg D-20359, Germany.
Richárd BártfaiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6525 GA, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine · DEPennsylvania State University · USGlaxoSmithKline (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms are central to the development and survival of all eukaryotic organisms. These mechanisms critically depend on the marking of chromatin domains with distinctive histone tail modifications (PTMs) and their recognition by effector protein complexes. Here we used quantitative proteomic approaches to unveil interactions between PTMs and associated reader protein complexes of Plasmodium falciparum, a unicellular parasite causing malaria. Histone peptide pull-downs with the most prominent and/or parasite-specific PTMs revealed the binding preference for 14 putative and novel reader proteins. Amongst others, they highlighted the acetylation-level-dependent recruitment of the BDP1/BDP2 complex and identified an PhD-finger protein (PHD 1, PF3D7_1008100) that could mediate a cross-talk between H3K4me2/3 and H3K9ac marks. Tagging and interaction proteomics of 12 identified proteins unveiled the composition of 5 major epigenetic complexes, including the elusive TBP-associated-factor complex as well as two distinct GCN5/ADA2 complexes. Furthermore, it has highlighted a remarkable degree of interaction between these five (sub)complexes. Collectively, this study provides an extensive inventory of PTM-reader interactions and composition of epigenetic complexes. It will not only fuel further explorations of gene regulation amongst ancient eukaryotes, but also provides a stepping stone for exploration of PTM-reader interactions for antimalarial drug development.

Indexed as

ChromatinEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression RegulationHistonesHumansMalaria, FalciparumMethylationPlasmodium falciparumProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalChromatinHistones

Identifiers

PMID31728527
PMCPMC7145593
OpenAlexW2997850962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.