Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728432›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2019

Detection of Surgical Site Infection Utilizing Automated Feature Generation in Clinical Notes.

Feichen Shen, David W Larson, James M Naessens, Elizabeth B Habermann, Hongfang Liu, Sunghwan Sohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical concept extraction: A methodology review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Feichen ShenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Rochester MN.
David W LarsonDepartment of Surgery Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester MN.
James M NaessensDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Rochester MN.
Elizabeth B HabermannDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Rochester MN.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Rochester MN.
Sunghwan SohnDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Rochester MN.

Funding

Secondary use of EMRs for surgical complication surveillanceR01EB019403 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, STORLIE, CURTIS · 2015 to 2022
$3.8M
Natural language processing for clinical and translational researchR01GM102282 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, PAKHOMOV, SERGUEI VS · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postsurgical complications (PSCs) are known as a deviation from the normal postsurgical course and categorized by severity and treatment requirements. Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of major PSCs and the most common healthcare-associated infection, resulting in increased length of hospital stay and cost. In this work, we proposed an automated way to generate keyword features using sublanguage analysis with heuristics to detect SSI from cohort in clinical notes and evaluated these keywords with medical experts. To further valid our approach, we also applied different machine learning algorithms on cohort using automatically generated keywords. The results showed that our approach was able to identify SSI keywords from clinical narratives and can be used as a foundation to develop an information extraction system or support search-based natural language processing (NLP) approaches by augmenting search queries.

Indexed as

feature generationmachine learningnatural language processingpostsurgical complication

Identifiers

PMID31728432
PMCPMC6855398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.