Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728401›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing sciences2019

A review and comparison of common maternal positions during the second-stage of labor.

Jing Huang, Yu Zang, Li-Hua Ren, Feng-Juan Li, Hong Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Manipulative Reduction for Abnormal Uterine Inclination in Vaginal Delivery.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Effect of spinning babiesBMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026
    Article
  5. Intrapartum sonographic evaluation of fetal head descent in relation to maternal position: comparison between dorsal lithotomy and kneeling squat positions.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing HuangSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yu ZangSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Li-Hua RenSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Feng-Juan LiMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Uyghur, China.
Hong LuSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The second-stage of labor is the most stressful part of childbirth process and the proper maternal position during this period is paramount for women's safe vaginal birth. Midwives play a pivotal role in managing maternal positions during the second-stage of labor. However, there is limited evidence to support an ideal maternal position during the second-stage of labor. Further, the difference between different maternal positions might not be apparent. This paper aims to review and compare the benefits and risks of common maternal positions during the second-stage of labor, thereby to provide midwives evidence-based practical guidelines.

Indexed as

ParturitionPostureReviewSecond labor stage

Identifiers

PMID31728401
PMCPMC6839002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.