Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728386›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2019

Developing an evidence-based and theory informed intervention to involve families in patients care after surgery: A quality improvement project.

Anne Maria Eskes, Anne Marthe Schreuder, Hester Vermeulen, Els Jacqueline Maria Nieveen van Dijkum, Wendy Chaboyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Use of IntegraEuropean burn journal · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Redefining the High-Output Stoma and Its Bearing on Clinical Practice Results of an International Consensus Panel.Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne Maria EskesDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anne Marthe SchreuderDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hester VermeulenIQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Els Jacqueline Maria Nieveen van DijkumDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wendy ChaboyerMenzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Griffith University · AUAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLTropIQ Health Sciences · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn the post-surgical setting, active involvement of family caregivers has the potential to improve patient outcomes by prevention of surgical complications that are sensitive to fundamental care. This paper describes the development of a theoretically grounded program to enhance the active involvement of family caregivers in fundamental care for post-surgical patients.

methodsWe used a quality improvement project following a multi-phase design. In Phase 1, an iterative method was used to combine evidence from a narrative review and professionals' preferences. In Phase 2, the logic model underlying the program was developed guided by four steps: (1) confirm situation, intervention aim, and target population; (2) documented expected outcomes, and outputs of the intervention; (3) identify and describe assumptions, external factors and inputs; and (4) confirm intervention components.

resultsPhase 1 identified a minimum set of family involvement activities that were both supported by staff and the narrative review. In Phase 2, the logic model was developed and includes (1) the inputs (e.g. educational- and environmental support), (2) the ultimate outcomes (e.g. reduction of postoperative complications), (3) the intermediate outcomes (e.g. behavioural changes), and (4) immediate outcomes (e.g. improved knowledge, skills and attitude).

conclusionsWe demonstrated how we aimed to change our practice to an environment in which family caregivers were stimulated to be actively involved in postoperative care on surgical wards, and how we took different factors into account. The description of this program may provide a solid basis for professionals to implement the family involvement program in their own setting.

Indexed as

Family caregiversHospital surgery departmentNursing careNursing modelsQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31728386
PMCPMC6838870
OpenAlexW2973154783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.