ArticlemHealth2019
Functional measurement post-stroke via mobile application and body-worn sensor technology.
Article in mHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acceptability of two mobile applications to support cross-sectoral, person-centred and empowering stroke rehabilitation - a process evaluation.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Mobile Data Gathering and Preliminary Analysis for the Functional Reach Test.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sensor-based systems for the measurement of Functional Reach Test results: a systematic review.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Accuracy, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability of pressure-based insoles for gait measurement in chronic stroke patients.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Using experience-based co-design to develop mobile/tablet applications to support a person-centred and empowering stroke rehabilitation.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Hurdles to developing and scaling remote patients' health management tools and systems: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Mobility-Focused Physical Outcome Measures Over Telecommunication Technology (Zoom): Intra and Interrater Reliability Trial.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2022Article
- Use of Mobile/Tablet and Web-Based Applications to Support Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Scoping Review.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2022Article
- Patient-Facing Mobile Apps to Support Physiotherapy Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Apps Within App Stores.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLong-term management of individuals post-stroke is essential due to the resultant chronic disability and risk for recurrent stroke. Mobile health technology shows increasing promise to provide cost-effective monitoring and support systems for the patient, caregiver, and healthcare team. Ideally, such systems will include stroke management adherence support, mechanisms to link patients and caregivers to resources, and secure longitudinal data collection with archive that are employed to optimize recovery. However, healthcare providers and computer science application developers must first collaborate to identify meaningful measures and develop methods to reliably gather such data remotely via mobile systems.
methodsmStroke is a mobile health system composed of two sensors and a mobile application designed to support optimal recovery for stroke survivors. Using the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model (ICF model), the authors identified 4 measures that are commonly used in the clinic and developed the mobile application features to support remote data collection: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) items 5 and 6 (Motor Arm and Leg function), Functional Reach Test (FRT), and 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT). At a local inpatient rehabilitation facility, each measure was executed with 35 stroke survivors through simultaneous scoring by the mStroke system and standardized clinical assessment. Correlation coefficients were calculated for clinician versus mStroke system scoring.
resultsAll four clinical measures significantly correlated with mStroke system app scoring: NIHSS Motor Arm-0.839, P<0.001; NIHSS Motor Leg-0.736, P<0.001; FRT-0.630, P<0.01; 10MWT-0.994, P<0.001.
conclusionsResults should be approached with caution as significant data skew was present for NIHSS Motor Arm and Motor Leg tests and the FRT results are not strong enough for broad translation. However, positive findings were demonstrated that support further investment in development, refinement, and testing of mobile health systems to provide clinically meaningful remote measurement via mobile technology. The ICF model was a helpful framework for guiding clinician and application developer collaboration and identifying meaningful features for app development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.