Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728198›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2019

Effective genome editing and identification of a regiospecific gallic acid 4-

Lijing Chang, Sheng Wu, Li Tian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. CRISPR/Cas as a Genome-Editing Technique in Fruit Tree Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. CRISPR-Based Genome Editing and Its Applications in Woody Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Genome Editing for Improving Crop Nutrition.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lijing Chang1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics and Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, 201602 Shanghai, China.
Sheng Wu1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics and Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, 201602 Shanghai, China.
Li Tian1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics and Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, 201602 Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6461-6072
Shanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center · CNCarnegie Department of Plant Biology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pomegranate (

Indexed as

Molecular engineering in plantsMutagenesisPlant molecular biologySecondary metabolism

Identifiers

PMID31728198
PMCPMC6838055
OpenAlexW2988135668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.