Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728183›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2019

Classification of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Who should have surgery?

Y Kuroda, T Tanaka, T Miyagawa, T Kawai, K Goto, S Tanaka, S Matsuda, H Akiyama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Atraumatic necrosis of the femoral head].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  13. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is effective and safe for femoral head osteonecrosis: a prospective midterm outcome study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Y KurodaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
T TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
T MiyagawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
T KawaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
K GotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
S TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
S MatsudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
H AkiyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPGifu University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUsing a simple classification method, we aimed to estimate the collapse rate due to osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in order to develop treatment guidelines for joint-preserving surgeries.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 505 hips from 310 patients (141 men, 169 women; mean age 45.5 years (sd 14.9; 15 to 86)) diagnosed with ONFH and classified them using the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification. The JIC system includes four visualized types based on the location and size of osteonecrotic lesions on weightbearing surfaces (types A, B, C1, and C2) and the stage of ONFH. The collapse rate due to ONFH was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with radiological collapse/arthroplasty as endpoints.

resultsBilateral cases accounted for 390 hips, while unilateral cases accounted for 115. According to the JIC types, 21 hips were type A, 34 were type B, 173 were type C1, and 277 were type C2. At initial diagnosis, 238/505 hips (47.0%) had already collapsed. Further, the cumulative survival rate was analyzed in 212 precollapsed hips, and the two-year and five-year collapse rates were found to be 0% and 0%, 7.9% and 7.9%, 23.2% and 36.6%, and 57.8% and 84.8% for types A, B, C1, and C2, respectively.

conclusionType A ONFH needs no further treatment, but precollapse type C2 ONFH warrants immediate treatment with joint-preserving surgery. Considering the high collapse rate, our study results justify the importance of early diagnosis and intervention in asymptomatic patients with type C2 ONFH.

Indexed as

CollapseFemoral headJoint-preserving surgeryKaplan–Meier survival analysisOsteonecrosis

Identifiers

PMID31728183
PMCPMC6825048
OpenAlexW2982632330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.