ArticleEvoDevo2019
Article in EvoDevo, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell sequencing reveals potential novel insights into appendage-patterning and joint-development in a spider.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026Article
- Robinow syndrome DVL1 variants disrupt morphogenesis and appendage formation in a Drosophila disease model.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026Article
- Developmental system drift in the patterning of the arthropod tarsus.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
- Vnd and En are expressed in orthogonal stripes and act in a brief competence window to combinatorially specify NB7-1 and its early lineage.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Single-cell sequencing suggests a conserved function of Hedgehog-signalling in spider eye development.EvoDevo · 2024Article
- Single-cell RNA sequencing of mid-to-late stage spider embryos: new insights into spider development.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- A chelicerate Wnt gene expression atlas: novel insights into the complexity of arthropod Wnt-patterning.EvoDevo · 2021Article
- Role of the Forkhead Transcription Factors Fd4 and Fd5 DuringFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Expression of the zinc finger transcription factor Sp6-9 in the velvet worm Euperipatoides kanangrensis suggests a conserved role in appendage development in Panarthropoda.Development genes and evolution · 2020Article
- The forkhead box containing transcription factor FoxB is a potential component of dorsal-ventral body axis formation in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum.Development genes and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forkhead box (Fox) transcription factors evolved early in animal evolution and represent important components of conserved gene regulatory networks (GRNs) during animal development. Most of the researches concerning Fox genes, however, are on vertebrates and only a relatively low number of studies investigate Fox gene function in invertebrates. In addition to this shortcoming, the focus of attention is often restricted to a few well-characterized Fox genes such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.