Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728042›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2019

The translational landscape in spinal cord injury: focus on neuroplasticity and regeneration.

Thomas H Hutson, Simone Di Giovanni

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07253233 (A Prospective, Single-center, Single-arm Clinical Study Protocol on the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury Using Autologous Concentrated Growth Factors), which is not on this map. Cited by 167 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07253233 early_phase1not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Single-center, Single-arm Clinical Study Protocol on the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury Using Autologous Concentrated Growth Factors

TypeinterventionalSponsorThird Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled10ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuryArmsConcentrated Growth Factors (CGF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 306 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Beyond Scar Removal: Reprogramming the Glial Scar for Neural Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Regional Molecular Diversity in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas H HutsonDivision of Neuroscience, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Simone Di GiovanniDivision of Neuroscience, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK. s.di-giovanni@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3154-5399
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R005311/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, we have witnessed a flourishing of novel strategies to enhance neuroplasticity and promote axon regeneration following spinal cord injury, and results from preclinical studies suggest that some of these strategies have the potential for clinical translation. Spinal cord injury leads to the disruption of neural circuitry and connectivity, resulting in permanent neurological disability. Recovery of function relies on augmenting neuroplasticity to potentiate sprouting and regeneration of spared and injured axons, to increase the strength of residual connections and to promote the formation of new connections and circuits. Neuroplasticity can be fostered by exploiting four main biological properties: neuronal intrinsic signalling, the neuronal extrinsic environment, the capacity to reconnect the severed spinal cord via neural stem cell grafts, and modulation of neuronal activity. In this Review, we discuss experimental evidence from rodents, nonhuman primates and patients regarding interventions that target each of these four properties. We then highlight the strengths and challenges of individual and combinatorial approaches with respect to clinical translation. We conclude by considering future developments and providing views on how to bridge the gap between preclinical studies and clinical translation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsHumansNerve RegenerationNeuronal PlasticityRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID31728042
OpenAlexW2988990722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.