Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728021›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2020

Groundwater cable bacteria conserve energy by sulfur disproportionation.

Hubert Müller, Sviatlana Marozava, Alexander J Probst, Rainer U Meckenstock

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cable Bacteria and Their Biotechnological Application.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  7. Characterization of DsrD and its interaction with the DsrAB dissimilatory sulfite reductase.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Groundwater chromate removal by autotrophic sulfur disproportionation.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hubert MüllerBiofilm Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141, Essen, Germany.
Sviatlana MarozavaInstitute of Groundwater Ecology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Alexander J ProbstBiofilm Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141, Essen, Germany.
Rainer U MeckenstockBiofilm Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141, Essen, Germany. rainer.meckenstock@uni-due.de.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEInstitute of Groundwater Ecology · DE

Funding

European Research Council 666952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cable bacteria of the family Desulfobulbaceae couple spatially separated sulfur oxidation and oxygen or nitrate reduction by long-distance electron transfer, which can constitute the dominant sulfur oxidation process in shallow sediments. However, it remains unknown how cells in the anoxic part of the centimeter-long filaments conserve energy. We found 16S rRNA gene sequences similar to groundwater cable bacteria in a 1-methylnaphthalene-degrading culture (1MN). Cultivation with elemental sulfur and thiosulfate with ferrihydrite or nitrate as electron acceptors resulted in a first cable bacteria enrichment culture dominated >90% by 16S rRNA sequences belonging to the Desulfobulbaceae. Desulfobulbaceae-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) unveiled single cells and filaments of up to several hundred micrometers length to belong to the same species. The Desulfobulbaceae filaments also showed the distinctive cable bacteria morphology with their continuous ridge pattern as revealed by atomic force microscopy. The cable bacteria grew with nitrate as electron acceptor and elemental sulfur and thiosulfate as electron donor, but also by sulfur disproportionation when Fe(Cl)

Indexed as

DeltaproteobacteriaEnergy MetabolismEnvironmental MicrobiologyGroundwaterIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicroscopy, Atomic ForceNitratesPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSulfidesSulfurWater MicrobiologyNitratesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSulfidesSulfur

Identifiers

PMID31728021
PMCPMC6976610
OpenAlexW2988556656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.