Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727920›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A Frailty Index based on clinical data to quantify mortality risk in dogs.

Tommaso Banzato, Giovanni Franzo, Roberta Di Maggio, Elisa Nicoletto, Silvia Burti, Matteo Cesari, Marco Canevelli

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How human and animal frailty index studies can inform each other: a brief narrative review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tommaso BanzatoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Productions and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, Italy. tommaso.banzato@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1261-9033
Giovanni FranzoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Productions and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-217X
Roberta Di MaggioDepartment of Animal Medicine, Productions and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, Italy.
Elisa NicolettoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Productions and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, Italy.
Silvia BurtiDepartment of Animal Medicine, Productions and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, Italy.
Matteo CesariFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0348-3664
Marco CanevelliDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7333-6478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty is defined as a decline in an organism's physiological reserves resulting in increased vulnerability to stressors. In humans, a single continuous variable, the so-called Frailty Index (FI), can be obtained by multidimensionally assessing the biological complexity of an ageing organism. Here, we evaluate this variability in dogs and compare it to the data available for humans. In dogs, there was a moderate correlation between age and the FI, and the distribution of the FI increased with age. Deficit accumulation was strongly related to mortality. The effect of age, when combined with the FI, was negligible. No sex-related differences were evident. The FI could be considered in epidemiological studies and/or experimental trials to account for the potential confounding effects of the health status of individual dogs. The age-related deficit accumulation reported in dogs is similar to that demonstrated in humans. Therefore, dogs might represent an excellent model for human aging studies.

Indexed as

AgedAnimalsConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicDog DiseasesDogsFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHealth StatusHumansMaleModels, Animal

Identifiers

PMID31727920
PMCPMC6856105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.