Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727892›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Rice life cycle-based global mercury biotransport and human methylmercury exposure.

Maodian Liu, Qianru Zhang, Menghan Cheng, Yipeng He, Long Chen, Haoran Zhang, Hanlin Cao, Huizhong Shen, Wei Zhang, Shu Tao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Visualization of HgResearch (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CRISPR-Cas9 Mediated Mutation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Substantial accumulation of mercury in the deepest parts of the ocean and implications for the environmental mercury cycle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maodian LiuMinistry of Education Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5059-0334
Qianru ZhangMinistry of Education Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Menghan ChengMinistry of Education Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Yipeng HeDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, 1080 Shennecossett Road, Groton, CT, 06340, USA.
Long ChenKey Laboratory of Geographic Information Science (Ministry of Education), East China Normal University, 200241, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-7307
Haoran ZhangMinistry of Education Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Hanlin CaoFinance Department, Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Huizhong ShenSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Wei ZhangSchool of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, 100872, Beijing, China.
Shu TaoMinistry of Education Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7374-7063
Xuejun WangMinistry of Education Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China. xjwang@urban.pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9990-1391
Peking University · CNEast China Normal University · CNGeorgia Institute of Technology · USRenmin University of China · CNUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protecting the environment and enhancing food security are among the world's greatest challenges. Fish consumption is widely considered to be the single significant dietary source of methylmercury. Nevertheless, by synthesizing data from the past six decades and using a variety of models, we find that rice could be a significant global dietary source of human methylmercury exposure, especially in South and Southeast Asia. In 2013, globalization caused 9.9% of human methylmercury exposure via the international rice trade and significantly aggravated rice-derived exposure in Africa (62%), Central Asia (98%) and Europe (42%). In 2016, 180 metric tons of mercury were generated in rice plants, 14-fold greater than that exported from oceans via global fisheries. We suggest that future research should consider both the joint ingestion of rice with fish and the food trade in methylmercury exposure assessments, and anthropogenic biovectors such as crops should be considered in the global mercury cycle.

Indexed as

Biological TransportCommerceCrops, AgriculturalEnvironmental ExposureGeographyHumansInternationalityMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsOryzaTime FactorsMercuryMethylmercury Compounds

Identifiers

PMID31727892
PMCPMC6856186
OpenAlexW2984759517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.