Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727887›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

The wax gourd genomes offer insights into the genetic diversity and ancestral cucurbit karyotype.

Dasen Xie, Yuanchao Xu, Jinpeng Wang, Wenrui Liu, Qian Zhou, Shaobo Luo, Wu Huang, Xiaoming He, Qing Li, Qingwu Peng and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Medicinal Ingredients of Wax Gourd (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiomics analysis ofHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Dasen XieGuangdong Key Laboratory for New Technology Research of Vegetables, Vegetable Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510640, China.
Yuanchao XuKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of the Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Laboratory of Horticultural Genomics, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
Jinpeng WangSchool of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Caofeidian Dist., Tangshan, Hebei, 063200, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2253-7752
Wenrui LiuGuangdong Key Laboratory for New Technology Research of Vegetables, Vegetable Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510640, China.
Qian ZhouKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of the Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Laboratory of Horticultural Genomics, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5269-8178
Shaobo LuoGuangdong Key Laboratory for New Technology Research of Vegetables, Vegetable Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510640, China.
Wu HuangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of the Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Laboratory of Horticultural Genomics, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5015-7167
Xiaoming HeGuangdong Key Laboratory for New Technology Research of Vegetables, Vegetable Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510640, China.
Qing LiKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of the Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Laboratory of Horticultural Genomics, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
Qingwu PengGuangdong Key Laboratory for New Technology Research of Vegetables, Vegetable Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510640, China.
Xueyong YangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of the Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Laboratory of Horticultural Genomics, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
Jiaqing YuanSchool of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Caofeidian Dist., Tangshan, Hebei, 063200, China.
Jigao YuSchool of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Caofeidian Dist., Tangshan, Hebei, 063200, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9156-2532
Xiyin WangSchool of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Caofeidian Dist., Tangshan, Hebei, 063200, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-0374
William J LucasAgricultural Genomic Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518124, China.
Sanwen HuangAgricultural Genomic Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518124, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8547-5309
Biao JiangGuangdong Key Laboratory for New Technology Research of Vegetables, Vegetable Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510640, China. jiangbiao198354@163.com.
Zhonghua ZhangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of the Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Laboratory of Horticultural Genomics, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China. zhangzhonghua@caas.cn.
Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNAgricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen · CNNorth China University of Science and Technology · CNInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers · CNQingdao Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The botanical family Cucurbitaceae includes a variety of fruit crops with global or local economic importance. How their genomes evolve and the genetic basis of diversity remain largely unexplored. In this study, we sequence the genome of the wax gourd (Benincasa hispida), which bears giant fruit up to 80 cm in length and weighing over 20 kg. Comparative analyses of six cucurbit genomes reveal that the wax gourd genome represents the most ancestral karyotype, with the predicted ancestral genome having 15 proto-chromosomes. We also resequence 146 lines of diverse germplasm and build a variation map consisting of 16 million variations. Combining population genetics and linkage mapping, we identify a number of regions/genes potentially selected during domestication and improvement, some of which likely contribute to the large fruit size in wax gourds. Our analyses of these data help to understand genome evolution and function in cucurbits.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, PlantKaryotypePhylogenyCucurbitaceaeDomesticationEvolution, MolecularFruitGenetics, PopulationGenome SizeMolecular Sequence AnnotationOrgan Size

Identifiers

PMID31727887
PMCPMC6856369
OpenAlexW2988267931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.