Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727750›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019

Automated ASPECTS in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Analysis with CT Perfusion.

V K Sundaram, J Goldstein, D Wheelwright, A Aggarwal, P S Pawha, A Doshi, J T Fifi, R De Leacy, J Mocco, J Puig and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. On old dogs and new tricks: CT perfusion predicts hemorrhagic transformation after thrombectomy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  6. The e-STROKE Study: The Design of a Prospective Observational Multicentral Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Real-world evaluation of Brainomix e-Stroke software.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

V K SundaramFrom the Department of Radiology (V.K.S., J.G., A.A., P.P., A.D., K.N.).ORCID 0000-0001-5548-5859
J GoldsteinFrom the Department of Radiology (V.K.S., J.G., A.A., P.P., A.D., K.N.).ORCID 0000-0001-9813-627X
D WheelwrightNeuroimaging Advanced and Exploratory Lab, Department of Neurology (D.W., J.T.F., R.D.L.).ORCID 0000-0001-9752-6399
A AggarwalFrom the Department of Radiology (V.K.S., J.G., A.A., P.P., A.D., K.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-9562-6457
P S PawhaFrom the Department of Radiology (V.K.S., J.G., A.A., P.P., A.D., K.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-8239-3308
A DoshiFrom the Department of Radiology (V.K.S., J.G., A.A., P.P., A.D., K.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-2507-436X
J T FifiNeuroimaging Advanced and Exploratory Lab, Department of Neurology (D.W., J.T.F., R.D.L.).ORCID 0000-0001-7786-5668
R De LeacyNeuroimaging Advanced and Exploratory Lab, Department of Neurology (D.W., J.T.F., R.D.L.).ORCID 0000-0001-9447-5338
J MoccoDepartment of Neurosurgery (J.T.F., R.D.L., J.M.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-2524
J PuigDepartment of Radiology (J.P.). University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2791-6599
K NaelFrom the Department of Radiology (V.K.S., J.G., A.A., P.P., A.D., K.N.) kambiznael@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4194-9488

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAutomated ASPECTS has the potential of reducing interobserver variability in the determination of early ischemic changes. We aimed to assess the performance of an automated ASPECTS software against the assessment of a neuroradiologist in a comparative analysis with concurrent CTP-based CBV ASPECTS. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with anterior circulation stroke who had baseline NCCT and CTP and underwent successful mechanical thrombectomy were included. NCCT-ASPECTS was assessed by 2 neuroradiologists, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. CTP-CBV ASPECTS was assessed by a different neuroradiologist. Automated ASPECTS was provided by Brainomix software. ASPECTS was dichotomized (ASPECTS ≥6 or <6) and was also based on the time from onset (>6 or ≤6 hours).

resultsA total of 58 patients were included. The interobserver agreement for NCCT ASPECTS was moderate (κ = 0.48) and marginally improved (κ = 0.64) for dichotomized data. Automated ASPECTS showed excellent agreement with consensus reads (κ = 0.84) and CTP-CBV ASPECTS (κ = 0.84). Intraclass correlation coefficients for ASPECTS across all 3 groups were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76-0.90, raw scores) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.96, dichotomized scores). Automated scores were comparable with consensus reads and CTP-CBV ASPECTS in patients when grouped on the basis of time from symptom onset (>6 or ≤6 hours). There was significant (

conclusionsASPECTS derived from an automated software performs equally as well as consensus reads of expert neuroradiologists and concurrent CTP-CBV ASPECTS and can be used to standardize ASPECTS reporting and minimize interpretation variability.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutomationBrain IschemiaCerebral InfarctionCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPerfusion ImagingRetrospective StudiesSoftware

Identifiers

PMID31727750
PMCPMC6975365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.