Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727672›Full record

ArticleInjury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention2020

Study protocol: a randomised non-inferiority trial using interactive virtual presence to remotely assist parents with child restraint installations.

David C Schwebel, Jennifer Morag MacKay, David Redden

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interactive Virtual Presence: A New Tool for Remote Healthcare.Advances in clinical medical research & healthcare delivery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David C SchwebelPsychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA schwebel@uab.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2141-8970
Jennifer Morag MacKaySafe Kids Worldwide, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
David ReddenBiostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Funding

Using Interactive Virtual Presence to Remotely Assist Parents with Child Restraint InstallationsR01HD099131 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SCHWEBEL, DAVID C · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotor vehicle crashes are the third-leading cause of death to American children aged 1-5 years. When installed correctly, child restraints (car seats) reduce risk of serious injury and death. However, most restraints are installed incorrectly. The current gold standard for correct installation is systematic car seat checks, where certified technicians help parents, but car seat checks are highly underused due to barriers in access, scheduling and resources.

methodsThe present study protocol describes plans to evaluate use of interactive virtual presence technology (interactive merged reality)-joint, simultaneous remote verbal and visual interaction and exposure to the same 3D stimuli-to assist remotely located parents installing child restraints. If effective, this technology could supplement or replace in-person checks and revolutionise how government, industry and non-profits help parents install child restraints properly. Building from preliminary studies, we propose a randomised non-inferiority trial to evaluate whether parents who install child restraints while communicating with remote expert technicians via interactive virtual presence on their smartphones achieve installations and learning not inferior in safety to parents who install restraints with on-site technicians. We will randomly assign 1476 caregivers at 7 US sites to install child restraints either via interactive virtual presence or live technicians. Correctness of installation will be assessed using objective checklists, both following installation and again 4 months later.

conclusionWe aim to demonstrate that child restraint installation is accurate (>90% correct) when conducted remotely, that such installations are not inferior to installation accuracy with live experts and that parents learn and retain information about child restraint installation.

Indexed as

Child Restraint SystemsCommunicationParentsAccidents, TrafficAdultAutomobilesEquipment DesignEquivalence Trials as TopicHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSafetySurveys and QuestionnairesUser-Computer InterfaceVideoconferencingbehavior changechildmotor vehicle occupantrandomized trialrestraints

Identifiers

PMID31727672
PMCPMC8175025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.