Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727662›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2019

Effectiveness of different recruitment strategies in an RCT of a surgical device: experience from the Endobarrier trial.

Aruchuna Ruban, Christina Gabriele Prechtl, Michael Alan Glaysher, Navpreet Chhina, Werd Al-Najim, Alexander Dimitri Miras, Claire Smith, Anthony P Goldstone, Mayank Patel, Michael Moore and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Aruchuna RubanDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK aruchuna@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9105-4025
Christina Gabriele PrechtlDepartment of Public Health, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, London, UK.
Michael Alan GlaysherDivision of Surgery, Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Navpreet ChhinaPsychoNeuroEndocrinology Research Group, Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry and Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Werd Al-NajimDietician, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alexander Dimitri MirasDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Claire SmithImperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anthony P GoldstonePsychoNeuroEndocrinology Research Group, Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry and Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mayank PatelDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Michael MoorePrimary Care Medical Group, University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK.
Hutan AshrafianDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1668-0672
James P ByrneDivision of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Julian P TeareDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 12/10/04Medical Research Council G0902002Medical Research Council MC_PC_14139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recruiting participants into clinical trials is notoriously difficult and poses the greatest challenge when planning any investigative study. Poor recruitment may not only have financial ramifications owing to increased time and resources being spent but could adversely influence the clinical impact of a study if it becomes underpowered. Herein, we present our own experience of recruiting into a nationally funded, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the Endobarrier versus standard medical therapy in obese patients with type 2diabetes. Despite these both being highly prevalent conditions, there were considerable barriers to the effectiveness of different recruitment strategies across each study site. Although recruitment from primary care proved extremely successful at one study site, this largely failed at another site prompting the implementation of multimodal recruitment strategies including a successful media campaign to ensure sufficient participants were enrolled and the study was adequately powered. From this experience, we propose where appropriate the early engagement and investment in media campaigns to enhance recruitment into clinical trials. Trial Registration: ISRCTN30845205.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EndoscopyGastric BypassHumansObesity, Morbidclinical trialsdiabetes & endocrinologyendoscopygeneral endocrinologystatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID31727662
PMCPMC6886935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.