Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727580›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2020

Algorithm-guided empirical tuberculosis treatment for people with advanced HIV (TB Fast Track): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial.

Alison D Grant, Salome Charalambous, Mpho Tlali, Aaron S Karat, Susan E Dorman, Christopher J Hoffmann, Suzanne Johnson, Anna Vassall, Gavin J Churchyard, Katherine L Fielding

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reducing HIV-Associated Post-Hospital Mortality Through Home-Based Care in South Africa: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient preferences for empiric TB treatment initiation.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Longitudinal, Observational Study of Etiology and Long-Term Outcomes of Sepsis in Malawi Revealing the Key Role of Disseminated Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Alison D GrantTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Africa Health Research Institute, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Electronic address: alison.grant@lshtm.ac.uk.
Salome CharalambousSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mpho TlaliThe Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Aaron S KaratTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Susan E DormanJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Christopher J HoffmannJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Suzanne JohnsonFoundation for Professional Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Anna VassallTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Gavin J ChurchyardTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa; Advancing Care and Treatment for TB/HIV, South African Medical Research Council, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Katherine L FieldingTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBAurum Institute · ZAFoundation for Professional Development · ZAJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100689Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis, which is often undiagnosed, is the major cause of death among HIV-positive people. We aimed to test whether the use of a clinical algorithm enabling the initiation of empirical tuberculosis treatment by nurses in primary health-care clinics would reduce mortality compared with standard of care for adults with advanced HIV disease.

methodsIn this open-label cluster-randomised controlled trial, we recruited individuals from 24 primary health-care clinics in South Africa. The clinics were randomly assigned (1:1) to either deliver an intervention or routine care (control) using computer-generated random numbers. Eligible participants were HIV-positive adults (aged ≥18 years) with CD4 counts of 150 cells per μL or less, who had not had antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the past 6 months or tuberculosis treatment in the past 3 months, and did not require urgent hospital referral. In intervention clinics, study nurses assessed participants on the basis of tuberculosis symptoms, body-mass index, point-of-care haemoglobin concentrations, and urine lipoarabinomannan assay results. Participants classified by a study algorithm as having high probability of tuberculosis (positive urine lipoarabinomannan assay, body-mass index <18·5 kg/m

findingsBetween Dec 19, 2012, and Dec 18, 2014, 3091 individuals were screened for eligibility, of whom 3053 were recruited, and 3022 (1507 participants in the intervention group and 1515 participants in the control group) were analysed for the primary outcome. 930 (61·7%) of 1507 participants in the intervention group versus 172 (11·4%) of 1515 participants in the control group had started tuberculosis treatment by 2 months. At 6 months, the mortality rate was 19·0 deaths per 100 person-years for the intervention group versus 21·6 deaths per 100 person-years in the control group (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·67-1·26, p=0·58; adjusted HR 0·87, 0·61-1·24, p=0·41). 28 (1·9%) of 1507 participants in the intervention group and ten (0·7%) of 1515 participants in the control group reported serious or severe adverse events. Grade 3 or 4 nausea and vomiting was the most common adverse event (ten participants in the intervention group and four participants in the control group). Among participants with adverse events, eight participants (six participants in the intervention group and two participants in the control group) died; none of the six deaths in the intervention group were attributed to the study intervention.

interpretationOur intervention substantially increased coverage of tuberculosis treatment in this high-risk population, but did not reduce mortality.

fundingJoint Global Health Trials (Medical Research Council, Department for International Development, Wellcome Trust).

Indexed as

AdultAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsAlgorithmsAnti-HIV AgentsAntitubercular AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSouth AfricaTreatment OutcomeTuberculosisAnti-HIV AgentsAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID31727580
PMCPMC7617063
OpenAlexW2984668273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.