Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727507›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2020

Discovering the Computational Relevance of Brain Network Organization.

Takuya Ito, Luke Hearne, Ravi Mill, Carrisa Cocuzza, Michael W Cole

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A corollary discharge circuit in human speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Co-representation of Functional Brain Networks Is Shaped by Cortical Myeloarchitecture and Reveals Individual Behavioral Ability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takuya ItoCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA; Behavioral and Neural Sciences PhD Program, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Luke HearneCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Ravi MillCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Carrisa CocuzzaCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA; Behavioral and Neural Sciences PhD Program, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Michael W ColeCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. Electronic address: michael.cole@rutgers.edu.

Funding

Brain Network Mechanisms of Aging-Related Cognitive DeclineR01AG055556 · NIA · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI COLE, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2017 to 2022
$2.3M
Brain Network Mechanisms of Instructed LearningR01MH109520 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI COLE, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055556NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding neurocognitive computations will require not just localizing cognitive information distributed throughout the brain but also determining how that information got there. We review recent advances in linking empirical and simulated brain network organization with cognitive information processing. Building on these advances, we offer a new framework for understanding the role of connectivity in cognition: network coding (encoding/decoding) models. These models utilize connectivity to specify the transfer of information via neural activity flow processes, successfully predicting the formation of cognitive representations in empirical neural data. The success of these models supports the possibility that localized neural functions mechanistically emerge (are computed) from distributed activity flow processes that are specified primarily by connectivity patterns.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionHumansNeural Pathwaysartificial intelligenceconnectivityconnectomemachine learningneural encoding/decodingneural networksrepresentations

Identifiers

PMID31727507
PMCPMC6943194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.