Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727203›Full record

ArticleParasitology2020

Genetic characterization of

Seyed Abdollah Hosseini, Mehdi Sharif, Shahabeddin Sarvi, Saeid Abediankenari, Mohammad Bagher Hashemi-Soteh, Afsaneh Amouei, Mahboobeh Montazeri, Sargis A Aghayan, Sara Gholami, Davoud Shaker and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evolution ofJournal of parasitology research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  7. Molecular detection and genotyping ofVeterinary and animal science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Iranian journal of parasitology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Seyed Abdollah HosseiniToxoplasmois Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mehdi SharifDepartment of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Sari Branch, Islamic AZAD University, Sari, Iran.
Shahabeddin SarviDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Mazandaran, Sari, Iran.
Saeid AbediankenariImmunogenetics Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, IR, Iran.
Mohammad Bagher Hashemi-SotehDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran.
Afsaneh AmoueiToxoplasmois Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mahboobeh MontazeriToxoplasmois Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Sargis A AghayanLaboratory of Zoology, Research Institute of Biology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia.
Sara GholamiDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Mazandaran, Sari, Iran.
Davoud ShakerDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Mazandaran, Sari, Iran.
Azadeh MizaniToxoplasmois Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Shafigheh ShabanzadehDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Mazandaran, Sari, Iran.
Ahmad DaryaniDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Mazandaran, Sari, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8571-5803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence and genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii in Iranian human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients using multilocus-nested polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (Mn-PCR-RFLP). A total of 102 serum samples obtained from infected patients were collected from the laboratory centres in northern Iran. Anti-T. gondii antibodies and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) detection were accomplished by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and PCR. The Mn-PCR-RFLP method was used for the genotyping of T. gondii. Overall, 68.6% (70/102) and 11.7% (12/102) of the individuals were tested positive for anti-T. gondii immunoglobulin G and T. gondii DNA, respectively. Complete genotyping was performed on 10/12 (83.3%) PCR-positive samples. Accordingly, the samples were classified as genotype #1 (type II clonal; n = 3, 30%), genotype #2 (type III clonal; n = 2, 20%), genotype #10 (type I clonal; n = 2, 20%), genotype #27 (type I variant; n = 1, 10%), genotype #35 (type I variant; n = 1, 10%) and genotype #48 (type III variant; n = 1, 10%). The results were indicative of the high frequency of the type I and type I variant of T. gondii strains in HIV-positive patients in northern Iran. Given the high prevalence of T. gondii and frequency of pathogenic types (pathogen in laboratory mice) in the patients, special measures should be taken to prevent the possible increased incidence of encephalitis by T. gondii.

Indexed as

GenotypeAdultAntibodies, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthPrevalenceToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisAntibodies, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanELISAgenotypeHIVIranMn-PCR-RFLPToxoplasma gondii

Identifiers

PMID31727203
PMCPMC10317644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.