Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727173›Full record

Trial reportActa neuropathologica communications2019

Improved risk-stratification for posterior fossa ependymoma of childhood considering clinical, histological and genetic features - a retrospective analysis of the HIT ependymoma trial cohort.

Stephanie T Jünger, Martin Mynarek, Inken Wohlers, Evelyn Dörner, Anja Zur Mühlen, Natalia Velez-Char, Katja von Hoff, Stefan Rutkowski, Monika Warmuth-Metz, Rolf-Dieter Kortmann and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ependymoma from Benign to Highly Aggressive Diseases: A Review.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Essential Management of Pediatric Brain Tumors.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pediatric ependymoma: an overview of a complex disease.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ependymomas in infancy: underlying genetic alterations, histological features, and clinical outcome.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie T JüngerDepartment of Neuropathology, Institute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-St. 25, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
Martin MynarekDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Inken WohlersGenome Informatics, Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Evelyn DörnerDepartment of Neuropathology, Institute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-St. 25, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
Anja Zur MühlenDepartment of Neuropathology, Institute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-St. 25, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
Natalia Velez-CharDepartment of Neuropathology, Institute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-St. 25, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
Katja von HoffDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan RutkowskiDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Monika Warmuth-MetzInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Rolf-Dieter KortmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Beate TimmermannWestdeutsches Protonentherapiezentrum, Essen, Germany.
Sven RahmannGenome Informatics, Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ludger Klein-HitpassDepartment of Cell Biology (Tumor Research), University of Duisburg-Essen Medical Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Andre O von BuerenDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Torsten PietschDepartment of Neuropathology, Institute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-St. 25, D-53127, Bonn, Germany. t.pietsch@uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0763-6506
University of Bonn · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEWest German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DE

Funding

Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung 2006.03, 2009.19, 2011.01 and 2014.17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRisk stratification of children with ependymomas of the posterior fossa in current therapeutic protocols is mainly based on clinical criteria. We aimed to identify independent outcome predictors for this disease entity by a systematic integrated analysis of clinical, histological and genetic information in a defined cohort of patients treated according to the German HIT protocols.

methodsTumor samples of 134 patients aged 0.2-15.9 years treated between 1999 and 2010 according to HIT protocols were analyzed for histological features including mitotic activity, necrosis and vascular proliferation and genomic alterations by SNP and molecular inversion probe analysis. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method with log rank test and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

resultsResidual tumor after surgery, chromosome 1q gain and structural genomic alterations were identified as predictors of significantly shorter event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, specific histological features including vascular proliferation, necrosis and high mitotic activity were predictive for shorter OS. Multivariate Cox regression revealed residual tumor, chromosome 1q gain and mitotic activity as independent predictors of both EFS and OS. Using these independent predictors of outcome, we were able to build a 3-tiered risk stratification model that separates patients with standard, intermediate and high risk, and which outperforms current stratification procedures.

conclusionThe integration of defined clinical, histological and genetic parameters led to an improved risk-stratification model for posterior fossa ependymoma of childhood. After validation in independent cohorts this model may provide the basis for risk-adapted treatment of children with ependymomas of the posterior fossa.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEpendymomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansInfantInfratentorial NeoplasmsMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentEpendymomaGeneticsNeuropathologyPosterior fossaRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID31727173
PMCPMC6857225
OpenAlexW2983535265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.