Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727087›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

Improving bimanual interaction with a prosthesis using semi-autonomous control.

Robin Volkmar, Strahinja Dosen, Jose Gonzalez-Vargas, Marcus Baum, Marko Markovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Measuring mental workload in assistive wearable devices: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robin VolkmarDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Strahinja DosenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jose Gonzalez-VargasDepartment at Ottobock SE & Co, KGaA, 37115, Duderstadt, Germany.
Marcus BaumInstitute of Computer Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Marko MarkovicDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. marko.markovic@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1875-1550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe loss of a hand is a traumatic experience that substantially compromises an individual's capability to interact with his environment. The myoelectric prostheses are state-of-the-art (SoA) functional replacements for the lost limbs. Their overall mechanical design and dexterity have improved over the last few decades, but the users have not been able to fully exploit these advances because of the lack of effective and intuitive control. Bimanual tasks are particularly challenging for an amputee since prosthesis control needs to be coordinated with the movement of the sound limb. So far, the bimanual activities have been often neglected by the prosthetic research community.

methodsWe present a novel method to prosthesis control, which uses a semi-autonomous approach in order to simplify bimanual interactions. The approach supplements the commercial SoA two-channel myoelectric control with two additional sensors. Two inertial measurement units were attached to the prosthesis and the sound hand to detect the movement of both limbs. Once a bimanual interaction is detected, the system mimics the coordination strategies of able-bodied subjects to automatically adjust the prosthesis wrist rotation (pronation, supination) and grip type (lateral, palmar) to assist the sound hand during a bimanual task. The system has been evaluated in eight able-bodied subjects performing functional uni- and bi-manual tasks using the novel method and SoA two-channel myocontrol. The outcome measures were time to accomplish the task, semi-autonomous system misclassification rate, subjective rating of intuitiveness, and perceived workload (NASA TLX).

resultsThe results demonstrated that the novel control interface substantially outperformed the SoA myoelectric control. While using the semi-autonomous control the time to accomplish the task and the perceived workload decreased for 25 and 27%, respectively, while the subjects rated the system as more intuitive then SoA myocontrol.

conclusionsThe novel system uses minimal additional hardware (two inertial sensors) and simple processing and it is therefore convenient for practical implementation. By using the proposed control scheme, the prosthesis assists the user's sound hand in performing bimanual interactions while decreasing cognitive burden.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsFunctional LateralityHandProsthesis DesignAdultAmputeesElectromyographyFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMovementPsychomotor PerformanceRotationWorkloadBimanual interactionsInertial sensingMyocontrolMyoelectric prosthesisSemi-autonomous controlSensor-fusion

Identifiers

PMID31727087
PMCPMC6857334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.