Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727073›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2019

Processes for engaging and retaining women who are experiencing adversity in longitudinal health services research.

Anna Price, Hannah Bryson, Ashlee Smith, Fiona Mensah, Sharon Goldfeld

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna PriceCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia. anna.price@mcri.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8117-8059
Hannah BrysonCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia.
Ashlee SmithCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia.
Fiona MensahDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia.
Sharon GoldfeldCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1037449National Health and Medical Research Council 1079418National Health and Medical Research Council 1082922National Health and Medical Research Council 1111160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen and families experiencing socioeconomic and psychosocial adversity are the least likely to access health care but most likely to benefit. For health services to effectively meet the needs of individuals experiencing adversity, research involving the health services must be truly representative. However, individuals experiencing adversity are typically excluded from or underrepresented in health services research. This paper reports on the implementation of a quality improvement approach designed to support recruitment and retention of pregnant women experiencing adversity in a longitudinal, health services randomized controlled trial ("right@home").

methodsright@home recruited Australian women from 10 public maternity hospitals across the states of Victoria and Tasmania who were experiencing adversity (≥2 risk factors on screening survey). Regular follow-up assessments were conducted by phone or face-to-face to child age 2 years. Research processes were designed taking heed of previous research demonstrating effective strategies for recruiting and retaining minority groups (e.g. piloting the recruitment process; recruiting via the health service providing care to the subgroup; remunerating participants); however, we were concerned that important information was missing. Therefore, once recruitment began, we conducted a continuous evaluation of the research processes, testing and implementing changes to processes or new strategies to maximize recruitment and retention (e.g. using a suite of strategies to maintain contact with families, using flexible data collection methods, obtaining consent for data linkage for future health and education data).

resultsright@home enrolled a large cohort of women (N = 722) experiencing high levels of adversity according to socioeconomic status and psychosocial risk factors, and achieved excellent retention (83% completion at 2 years). Most strategies appeared to increase recruitment and retention. All required additional time from the research team to develop and test, and some required extra funding, which ranged from minor (e.g. printing) to substantial (e.g. salaries, remuneration).

conclusionsBy taking a quality improvement approach, supported by sufficient resourcing and flexible research processes, it is possible to recruit and retain a large cohort of women experiencing adversity who are typically missed or lost from longitudinal research.

Indexed as

FemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyPregnant PeopleQuality ImprovementSocial SupportVulnerable PopulationsFollow-up studiesHealth services researchQuality improvementRecruitmentVulnerable

Identifiers

PMID31727073
PMCPMC6854799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.