ArticleBMC health services research2019
Make it complicated: a qualitative study utilizing a complexity framework to explain improvement in health care.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-Minute Preceptor, SNAPPS, and Traditional Teaching in the Acquisition of Clinical Reasoning Skills by Medical Students.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Location-independent leadership: managers' experiences leading prehospital emergency care in Sweden - a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- A Patient-Driven Mobile Health Innovation in Cystic Fibrosis Care: Comparative Cross-Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Building resilience: analysis of health care leaders' perspectives on the Covid-19 response in Region Stockholm.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Reducing sickness absence among public-sector healthcare employees: the difference-making roles of managerial and employee participation.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024Article
- Mind the gap: analysis of two pilot projects of a home telehealth service for persons with complex conditions in a Swedish hospital.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- How hospital top managers reason about the central leadership task of balancing quality of patient care, economy and professionals' engagement: an interview study.Leadership in health services (Bradford, England) · 2022Article
- Improving care for immigrant women before, during, and after childbirth - what can we learn from regional interventions within a national program in Sweden?BMC health services research · 2022Article
- How to design, implement and evaluate organizational interventions for maximum impact: the Sigtuna Principles.European journal of work and organizational psychology · 2021Article
- Processual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Integrated Care's New Protagonist: The Expanding Role of Digital Health.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuccessful application of Quality Improvement (QI) methods is challenging, and awareness of the role context plays has increased. Complexity science has been advocated as a way to inform change efforts. However, empirical support is scarce, and it is still difficult to grasp the practical implications for QI interventions. The aim of this study was to use a complexity-based leadership framework to explain how managers in a clinical department addressed external requirements to cut costs without compromising patient outcomes and experience.
methodsExplanatory case study design of a Danish OB/GYN department tasked to improve efficiency. Data came from documents, 30 interviews, and 250 h of observations over 3 years. A Complexity Analysis Framework that combined two complexity-based leadership frameworks was developed to analyze all changes implemented to reduce cost, while maintaining clinical quality.
resultsManagers reframed the efficiency requirement as an opportunity for quality improvement. Multiple simple, complicated, and complex situations were addressed with an adaptive approach to quality improvement. Changes were made to clinical pathways for individual conditions (n = 37), multiple conditions (n = 7), and at the organizational level (n = 9). At the organizational level, changes addressed referral practice, physical space in the department, flow and capacity, discharge speed, and managerial support. Managers shared responsibility with staff; together they took a "professional path" and systematically analyzed each clinical pathway through process mapping, attentive to patterns that emerged, before deciding on the next steps, such as a engaging in a complex process of probing - the iterative development and testing of new responses.
conclusionsQuality improvement efforts could benefit from an understanding of the importance of learning and sharing responsibility to deal with the co-existing degrees of contextual complexity in modern health care. By "making things complicated" through a systematic analysis that engages staff in an open and reflective dialog, clinical praxis and established organizational structures can be questioned and improved. The Complexity Analysis Framework could then help managers to identify improvement opportunities, know when to implement technical solutions, and when to keep abreast of emerging patterns and allow appropriate responses to complex challenges to evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.