Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727061›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular diabetology2019

The oral glucose tolerance test-derived incremental glucose peak is associated with greater arterial stiffness and maladaptive arterial remodeling: The Maastricht Study.

Yuri D Foreman, Martijn C G J Brouwers, Tos T J M Berendschot, Martien C J M van Dongen, Simone J P M Eussen, Marleen M J van Greevenbroek, Ronald M A Henry, Alfons J H M Houben, Carla J H van der Kallen, Abraham A Kroon and 4 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Glucose Variability: How Does It Work?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yuri D ForemanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. yuri.foreman@mumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0035-1586
Martijn C G J BrouwersCARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tos T J M BerendschotUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Martien C J M van DongenDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Simone J P M EussenCARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marleen M J van GreevenbroekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ronald M A HenryDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alfons J H M HoubenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Carla J H van der KallenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abraham A KroonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Koen D ReesinkCARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Miranda T SchramDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nicolaas C SchaperCARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Coen D A StehouwerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDaily glucose variability may contribute to vascular complication development irrespective of mean glucose values. The incremental glucose peak (IGP) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) can be used as a proxy of glucose variability. We investigated the association of IGP with arterial stiffness, arterial remodeling, and microvascular function, independent of HbA

methodsIGP was calculated as the peak minus baseline plasma glucose value during a seven-point OGTT in 2758 participants (age: 60 ± 8 years; 48% women) of The Maastricht Study, an observational population-based cohort. We assessed the cross-sectional associations between IGP and arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity [cf-PWV], carotid distensibility coefficient [carDC]), arterial remodeling (carotid intima-media thickness [cIMT]; mean [CWS

resultsHigher IGP was independently associated with higher cf-PWV (regression coefficient [B]: 0.054 m/s [0.020; 0.089]) and with higher CWS

conclusionsIGP was independently associated with aortic stiffness and maladaptive carotid remodeling, but not with carotid stiffness, cIMT, and microvascular function measures. Future studies should investigate whether glucose variability is associated with cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Glucose Tolerance TestVascular RemodelingVascular StiffnessAdultAgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCarotid ArteriesCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanArterial remodelingArterial stiffnessGlucose metabolism statusGlucose variabilityOral glucose tolerance test

Identifiers

PMID31727061
PMCPMC6857146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.