Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727059›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Economic evaluation studies in the field of HIV/AIDS: bibliometric analysis on research development and scopes (GAP

Bach Xuan Tran, Long Hoang Nguyen, Hugo C Turner, Son Nghiem, Giang Thu Vu, Cuong Tat Nguyen, Carl A Latkin, Cyrus S H Ho, Roger C M Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Emerging Syndemic of Smoking and Cardiopulmonary Diseases in People Living with HIV in Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bach Xuan TranDepartment of Health Economics, Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam. bach.jhu@gmail.com.
Long Hoang NguyenCenter of Excellence in Behavioral Medicine, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam.
Hugo C TurnerOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam.
Son NghiemCentre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Giang Thu VuCenter of Excellence in Evidence-based Medicine, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam.
Cuong Tat NguyenInstitute for Global Health Innovations, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.
Carl A LatkinBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cyrus S H HoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Roger C M HoCenter of Excellence in Behavioral Medicine, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid decrease in international funding for HIV/AIDS has been challenging for many nations to effectively mobilize and allocate their limited resources for HIV/AIDS programs. Economic evaluations can help inform decisions and strategic planning. This study aims to examine the trends and patterns in economic evaluation studies in the field of HIV/AIDS and determine their research landscapes.

methodsUsing the Web of Science databases, we synthesized the number of papers and citations on HIV/AIDS and economic evaluation from 1990 to 2017. Collaborations between authors and countries, networks of keywords and research topics were visualized using frequency of co-occurrence and Jaccards' similarity index. A Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) analysis to categorize papers into different topics/themes.

resultsA total of 372 economic evaluation papers were selected, including 351 cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA), 11 cost-utility analyses (CUA), 12 cost-benefit analyses (CBA). The growth of publications, their citations and usages have increased remarkably over the years. Major research topics in economic evaluation studies consisted of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation and treatment; drug use prevention interventions and prevention of mother-to-child transmission interventions. Moreover, lack of contextualized evidence was found in specific settings with high burden HIV epidemics, as well as emerging most-at-risk populations such as trans-genders or migrants.

conclusionThis study highlights the knowledge and geographical discrepancies in HIV/AIDS economic evaluation literature. Future research directions are also informed for advancing economic evaluation in HIV/AIDS research.

Indexed as

BibliometricsBiomedical ResearchCost-Benefit AnalysisHIV InfectionsHumansBibliometricContent analysisEconomic evaluationHealth economicsHIV/AIDS

Identifiers

PMID31727059
PMCPMC6854742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.