Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31727026›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

Specialty choice determinants among Mexican medical students: a cross-sectional study.

Carlos Gutiérrez-Cirlos, J Jesús Naveja, Manuel García-Minjares, Adrián Martínez-González, Melchor Sánchez-Mendiola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlos Gutiérrez-CirlosNational Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition "Salvador Zubirán", Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9260-5370
J Jesús NavejaFaculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-6690
Manuel García-MinjaresCoordinador de Desarrollo Educativo e Innovación Curricular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Centro Cultural, S/N. Edificio CIPPS, 1er Piso, Ciudad Universitaria, Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, CdMx, 04510, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9535-5917
Adrián Martínez-GonzálezFaculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-9639
Melchor Sánchez-MendiolaFaculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico. melchorsm@unam.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9664-3208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe choice of medical specialty is related to multiple factors, students' values, and specialty perceptions. Research in this area is needed in low- and middle-income countries, where the alignment of specialty training with national healthcare needs has a complex local interdependency. The study aimed to identify factors that influence specialty choice among medical students.

methodsSenior students at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) Faculty of Medicine answered a questionnaire covering demographics, personal experiences, vocational features, and other factors related to specialty choice. Chi-square tests and factor analyses were performed.

resultsThe questionnaire was applied to 714 fifth-year students, and 697 provided complete responses (response rate 81%). The instrument Cronbach's alpha was 0.8. The mean age was 24 ± 1 years; 65% were women. Eighty percent of the students wanted to specialize, and 60% had participated in congresses related to the specialty of interest. Only 5% wanted to remain as general practitioners. The majority (80%) wanted to enter a core specialty: internal medicine (29%), general surgery (24%), pediatrics (11%), gynecology and obstetrics (11%) and family medicine (4%). The relevant variables for specialty choice were grouped in three dimensions: personal values that develop and change during undergraduate training, career needs to be satisfied, and perception of specialty characteristics.

conclusionsSpecialty choice of medical students in a middle-income country public university is influenced by the undergraduate experience, the desire to study a subspecialty and other factors (including having skills related to the specialty and type of patients).

Indexed as

Career ChoiceMedicineStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansMaleMexicoSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCareer choiceGraduate studiesMéxicoProfessional identityResidency training

Identifiers

PMID31727026
PMCPMC6854711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.