ArticleGenes2019
A Weighted Genomic Relationship Matrix Based on Fixation Index (F
Article in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes using DArTseq technology.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Enhancing genomic prediction ability of blast resistance using genome-wide association study-derived marker weights in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) populations.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Leveraging Fst and Genetic Distance to Optimize Reference Sets for Enhanced Cross-Population Genomic Prediction.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Prioritization of SNP markers for genomic prediction in closed beef cattle populations.Translational animal science · 2026Article
- Role of multi-omics in aquaculture genetics and breeding: current status and future perspective.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- Variable selection strategies for genomic prediction of growth and carcass related traits in experimental Nellore cattle herds under different selection criteria.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- FGenes · 2025Article
- Strategies to Increase Prediction Accuracy in Genomic Selection of Complex Traits in Alfalfa (Cells · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A dramatic increase in the density of marker panels has been expected to increase the accuracy of genomic selection (GS), unfortunately, little to no improvement has been observed. By including all variants in the association model, the dimensionality of the problem should be dramatically increased, and it could undoubtedly reduce the statistical power. Using all Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to compute the genomic relationship matrix (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.