Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31726665›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2019

Investigation of Leukocyte Viability and Damage in Spiral Microchannel and Contraction-Expansion Array.

Thammawit Suwannaphan, Werayut Srituravanich, Achariya Sailasuta, Prapruddee Piyaviriyakul, Suchaya Bhanpattanakul, Wutthinan Jeamsaksiri, Witsaroot Sripumkhai, Alongkorn Pimpin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thammawit SuwannaphanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Werayut SrituravanichDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Achariya SailasutaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Prapruddee PiyaviriyakulDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Suchaya BhanpattanakulDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Wutthinan JeamsaksiriThailand Microelectronic Centre, Ministry of Science and Technology, Chachoengsao 24000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-0703
Witsaroot SripumkhaiThailand Microelectronic Centre, Ministry of Science and Technology, Chachoengsao 24000, Thailand.
Alongkorn PimpinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inertial separation techniques in a microfluidic system have been widely employed in the field of medical diagnosis for a long time. Despite no requirement of external forces, it requires strong hydrodynamic forces that could potentially cause cell damage or loss during the separation process. This might lead to the wrong interpretation of laboratory results since the change of structures and functional characteristics of cells due to the hydrodynamic forces that occur are not taken into account. Therefore, it is important to investigate the cell viability and damage along with the separation efficacy of the device in the design process. In this study, two inertial separation techniques-spiral microchannel and contraction-expansion array (CEA)-were examined to evaluate cell viability, morphology and intracellular structures using a trypan blue assay (TB), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Wright-Giemsa stain. We discovered that cell loss was not significantly found in a feeding system, i.e., syringe, needle and tube, but mostly occurred in the inertial separation devices while the change of cell morphology and intracellular structures were found in the feeding system and inertial separation devices. Furthermore, percentage of cell loss was not significant in both devices (7-10%). However, the change of cell morphology was considerably increased (30%) in spiral microchannel (shear stress dominated) rather than in CEA (12%). In contrast, the disruption of intracellular structures was increased (14%) in CEA (extensional and shear stress dominated equally) rather than spiral microchannel (2%). In these experiments, leukocytes of canine were used as samples because their sizes are varied in a range between 7-12 µm, and they are commonly used as a biomarker in many clinical and medical applications.

Indexed as

cell morphologycell viabilitycontraction-expansion arrayintracellular structuresLeukocytesmicrofluidicsspiral microchannel

Identifiers

PMID31726665
PMCPMC6915465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.