Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31726490›Full record

Trial reportThoracic cancer2020

A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Keke Nie, Zhen Zhang, Yunhong You, Xingjun Zhuang, Chunling Zhang, Youxin Ji

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A patient-centred approach to malignant pleural effusion.European clinical respiratory journal · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Malignant pleural disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keke NieDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Cancer Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Zhen ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Cancer Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Yunhong YouDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Cancer Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Xingjun ZhuangDepartment of Oncology, PLA 971 Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Chunling ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Central Hospital, the Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9311-0000
Youxin JiDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Central Hospital, the Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2303-8784
Qingdao University · CNPeople's Liberation Army 401 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the efficiency and toxicity of bevacizumab by intrapleural or intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsSensitizing mutation negative NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion were randomized into two groups in 1:1 ratio. The pleural effusion was completely drained in 24 hours; one group received intrapleural infusion and the second group received intravenous infusion of bevacizumab at a dose of 7.5 mg per kg bodyweight. The serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was tested before and 72 hours after injection of bevacizumab. Computerized tomography (CT) scan to evaluate pleural effusions was carried out at four weeks for each patient and their survival followed-up.

resultsA total of 67 patients were screened and 43 enrolled into the study. The response rate was 80% (16 of 20) in the intrapleural group and 66.7% (14 of 21) in the intravenous group. The median duration of response (DoR) of pleural effusion was 4.50 months and 3.70 months, respectively. The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 67.25% in the intrapleural group and 57.19% in the intravenous group compared to baseline level (P = 0.276). The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 52.02% compared to baseline level in patients' DoR less than three months and 68.33% in patients' DoR longer than three months, respectively (P = 0.014). The main side effects noted were mild to moderate hypertension, proteinuria and epistaxis.

conclusionsBevacizumab intrapleural infusion had higher efficiency and higher safety than intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion caused by NSCLC. The decreased level of serum VEGF at 72 hours after bevacizumab treatment was closely related to the response rate and duration of the response of pleural effusion.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfusions, IntravenousInfusions, ParenteralLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPleural Effusion, MalignantPrognosisAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBevacizumabmalignant pleural effusionnon-small-cell lung cancervascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID31726490
PMCPMC6938744
OpenAlexW2987921837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.