Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31726485›Full record

Trial reportJournal of sleep research2020

Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnea patients: The Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES).

Sogol Javaheri, Daniel J Gottlieb, Stuart F Quan

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of sleep research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Association of tirzepatide with changes in OSA-related measures based on baseline characteristics - post hoc analyses of SURMOUNT-OSA.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. The implementation of electronic health records in positive airway pressure tracking systems for better patient care: where are we now?Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. [Changes of carotid artery elasticity before and after CPAP in patients with obstructive sleep apnea by ultrasonic ultrafast pulse wave velocity technique].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Sleep Apnea and Heart.Sleep medicine research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sogol JavaheriBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2651-3018
Daniel J GottliebBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Stuart F QuanBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

APPLES: Apnea Positive Pressure Long-Term Efficacy StudyU01HL068060 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KUSHIDA, CLETE A · 2002 to 2007
$14.1M
SAM FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALERTNESS IN PATIENTS W/ SLEEP DISN44NS002394 · NINDS · SAM TECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI GEVINS, ALAN S · 2000 to 2000
$487k
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL068060NINDS NIH HHS N44-NS-002394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with hypertension, and short-term studies have demonstrated a modest reduction in blood pressure with continuous positive airway pressure therapy. We evaluated the effects of continuous positive airway pressure versus sham continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in 1,101 participants with obstructive sleep apnea from the Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study, a randomized, sham-controlled double-blinded study designed to assess the impact of continuous positive airway pressure on neurocognition. Participants with apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 10 were randomly assigned to continuous positive airway pressure or sham continuous positive airway pressure. Blood pressures measured in the morning and evening at baseline, 2 months and 6 months were analysed post hoc using a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance. The largest magnitude reduction was approximately 2.4 mmHg in morning systolic pressure that occurred at 2 months in the continuous positive airway pressure arm as compared with an approximate 0.5 mmHg reduction in the sham group (continuous positive airway pressure effect -1.9 mmHg, p = .008). At 6 months, the difference between groups was diminished and no longer statistically significant (continuous positive airway pressure effect -0.9 mmHg, p = .12). Sensitivity analysis with use of multiple imputation approaches to account for missing data did not change the results. Treatment with continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea reduces morning but not evening blood pressure in a population with well-controlled blood pressure. The effect was greater after 2 than after 6 months of treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood PressureContinuous Positive Airway PressureDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSleep Apnea, ObstructiveYoung Adultblood pressurecontinuous positive airway pressurehypertensionobstructive sleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID31726485
PMCPMC7188383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.