Trial reportJournal of the American College of Cardiology2020
Prior Heart Failure Hospitalization, Clinical Outcomes, and Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Valsartan in HFpEF.
Trial report in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01920711 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients (NYHA Class II-IV) With Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAGON-HF)
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction management: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of a controlled study of levosimendan combined with Sacubitril/Valsartan for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in China.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of volenrelaxin in worsening heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- In-Hospital or Out-of-Hospital Initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Patients With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction After A Worsening Heart Failure Event: The PARAGLIDE-HF Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a pre-specified participant-level pooled analysis of PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF.European heart journal · 2023Trial
- Sacubitril/valsartan and loop diuretic requirement in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the PARAGON-HF trial.European journal of heart failure · 2023Trial
- The Relationship between Angiotensin-Neprilysin Treatment, Echocardiographic Parameters, and NT-proBNP Levels in HFpEF Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Diuretic therapy as prognostic enrichment factor for clinical trials in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021Trial
- Advances in the Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.International journal of heart failure · 2026Review
- Pharmacological treatment for patients with obesity and heart failure: Focus on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. European Journal of Heart Failure expert consensus document.European journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- ANMCO position paper: diagnosis and treatment of heart failure with preserved systolic function.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Sacubitril/valsartan in a wide spectrum of heart failure patients (from mechanisms of action to outcomes in specific populations).Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Prediction model of rehospitalization and mortality in heart failure patients with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction: the AD2NNER risk score.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The effect of sacubitril/valsartan sodium on cardiac function and ventricular remodeling in patients with heart failure after PCI for acute myocardial infarction.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Emerging therapeutic frontiers in hypertension management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of potential ototoxicity associated with sacubitril/valsartan based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Embracing an era of targeted combination therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Multi-Target In-Silico modeling strategies to discover novel angiotensin converting enzyme and neprilysin dual inhibitors.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine learning in heart failure diagnosis, prediction, and prognosis: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe period shortly after hospitalization for heart failure (HF) represents a high-risk window for recurrent clinical events, including rehospitalization or death.
objectivesThis study sought to determine whether the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan varies in relation to the proximity to hospitalization for HF among patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
methodsIn this post hoc analysis of PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI [Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor] with ARB [Angiotensin Receptor Blocker] Global Outcomes in HFpEF), we assessed the risk of clinical events and response to sacubitril/valsartan in relation to time from last HF hospitalization among patients with HFpEF (≥45%). The primary outcome was composite total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death, analyzed by using a semiparametric proportional rates method, stratified by geographic region.
resultsOf 4,796 validly randomized patients in PARAGON-HF, 622 (13%) were screened during hospitalization or within 30 days of prior hospitalization, 555 (12%) within 31 to 90 days, 435 (9%) within 91 to 180 days, and 694 (14%) after 180 days; 2,490 (52%) were never previously hospitalized. Over a median follow-up of 35 months, risk of total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death was inversely and nonlinearly associated with timing from prior HF hospitalization (p < 0.001). There was a gradient in relative risk reduction in primary events with sacubitril/valsartan from patients hospitalized within 30 days (rate ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.53 to 0.99) to patients never hospitalized (rate ratio: 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 1.24; trend in relative risk reduction: p
conclusionsRecent hospitalization for HFpEF identifies patients at high risk for near-term clinical progression. In the PARAGON-HF trial, the relative and absolute benefits of sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan in HFpEF appear to be amplified when initiated in the high-risk window after hospitalization and warrant prospective validation. (PARAGON-HF; NCT01920711).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.