Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31726021›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2019

Agua4All: Providing Safe Drinking Water in Rural California Communities.

Anisha I Patel, Amelie A Hecht, Karla E Hampton, Christina Hecht, Sarah Buck

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anisha I PatelDivision of General Pediatrics, Stanford University, Medical School Office Building, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305. Email: anipatel@stanford.edu.
Amelie A HechtPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Karla E HamptonIntuitive Mind Consulting, Houston, Texas.
Christina HechtNutrition Policy Institute at the University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California.
Sarah BuckRCAP Inc., Washington, District of Columbia.
Children’s Cause for Cancer Advocacy · USIntuit (United States) · USLee University · USUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Increasing Water Intake In Lieu of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages among Latino YouthR13HD075498 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PATEL, ANISHA INDRAVADAN · 2012 to 2014
$90k
NICHD NIH HHS R13 HD075498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDrinking water instead of sugar-sweetened beverages may reduce obesity and dental caries. Tap water is more affordable and sustainable than bottled water and more likely to contain fluoride, which prevents caries. To address inequities in access to safe tap water, cross-sector partners established the Agua4All safe drinking-water program in 2 rural San Joaquin Valley, California, communities. The program's objective was to examine Agua4All's feasibility, acceptability, and effect on water intake.

methodsWe provided bottle-filling stations dispensing safe water at 12 sites in 2 communities and provided limited promotional support. To compare the effect of different levels of promotion, sites in 1 community also received a promotions toolkit, a stipend, and assistance in developing and conducting their own promotional activities (site-led promotion). Beverage intake at sites was observed at baseline (pre-installation), at time 1 (post-installation), and at times 2 and 3 (post-promotion). Flowmeters tracked water dispensings. Staff interviews examined implementation barriers and facilitators.

resultsFrom baseline to time 3, a nonsignificant increase (21.16%) occurred in the proportion of people drinking water at sites with water stations and site-led promotion compared with sites with water stations and limited promotion (5.13%) (P = .14). Mean daily gallons of water taken from stations per site was 3.61 (standard deviation, 3.84). Most staff members (77%) at the sites preferred water stations to traditional drinking fountains.

conclusionBottle-filling stations with safe water and site-led promotion are a promising strategy for increasing water intake in communities without safe tap water. Larger studies should examine the effects of such stations on intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and on overall health.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationCaliforniaDrinking WaterHealth PromotionHumansPublic HealthWater SupplyDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID31726021
PMCPMC6880921
OpenAlexW2988766270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.