ArticleJAMA oncology2020
Risk-Adapted Starting Age of Screening for Relatives of Patients With Breast Cancer.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Versus Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in a Screening Population: Implications for Risk-based Prevention and Screening Strategies.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Paclitaxel drives TREM2Nature communications · 2026Article
- Preventing premature deaths through polygenic risk scores.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A cost-effective breast cancer screening strategy for Urban China: Findings from a Shenzhen-based modeling study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Breast imaging recommendations for young females (age < 40 years) with ≥ 20% lifetime breast cancer risk: practice patterns at a specialized clinic.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- A narrative review of sleep and breast cancer: from epidemiology to mechanisms.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Review
- CNN-based deep learning approach for classification of invasive ductal and metastasis types of breast carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Extending the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Model of Invasive Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Article
- Race and Ethnicity-Adjusted Age Recommendation for Initiating Breast Cancer Screening.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Screening Programs for Breast Cancer: Toward Individualized, Risk-Adapted Strategies of Early Detection.Cancer treatment and research · 2023Article
- Breast cancer incidence among women with a family history of breast cancer by relative's age at diagnosis.Cancer · 2022Article
- Endoscopic Screening and Risk of Colorectal Cancer according to Type 2 Diabetes Status.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2022Article
- Use of Breast Cancer Risk Factors to Identify Risk-Adapted Starting Age of Screening in China.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Risk-Adjusted Cancer Screening and Prevention (RiskAP): Complementing Screening for Early Disease Detection by a Learning Screening Based on Risk Factors.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Racial and regional disparities of triple negative breast cancer incidence rates in the United States: An analysis of 2011-2019 NPCR and SEER incidence data.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Family history of breast cancer as a second primary malignancy in relatives: a nationwide cohort study.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Colonoscopy Screening According to Individuals' Risk Profiles.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Article
- Risk of prostate cancer in relatives of prostate cancer patients in Sweden: A nationwide cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2021Article
- Integrating Clinical and Polygenic Factors to Predict Breast Cancer Risk in Women Undergoing Genetic Testing.JCO precision oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceBreast cancer screening guidelines acknowledge the need for earlier screening for women at increased risk but provide limited guidance for women with a family history of breast cancer. A risk-adapted starting age of screening for relatives of patients with breast cancer may help supplement current screening guidelines.
objectiveTo identify the risk-adapted starting age of breast cancer screening on the basis of a woman's detailed family history. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis nationwide cohort study analyzed data recorded in the Swedish family-cancer data sets. All women born from 1932 onward and with at least 1 known first-degree relative (FDR) were included (N = 5 099 172). Data from January 1, 1958, to December 31, 2015, were collected. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2017, to March 31, 2019. EXPOSURES: Family history of breast cancer in FDRs and second-degree relatives (SDRs). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary invasive breast cancer diagnosis and the age at which women with different constellations of family history attained the risk level at which breast screening is usually recommended.
resultsOf the 5 099 172 women included in the study, 118 953 (2.3%) received a diagnosis of primary invasive breast cancer. A total of 102 751 women (86.4%; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 55.9 [11.1] years) did not have family history of breast cancer in FDRs and SDRs at the time of their diagnosis. Risk-adapted starting age of breast cancer screening varied by number of FDRs and SDRs with breast cancer diagnosis and the age at diagnosis of the FDRs. For example, for screening recommendation at age 50 years for the general population (2.2% 10-year cumulative risk), women with multiple affected FDRs, with the youngest affected relative receiving a diagnosis before age 50 years, reached the benchmark risk level at age 27 years. When the youngest relative received a diagnosis after age 50 years, however, this risk level was attained at age 36 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study identifies possible risk-based starting ages for breast cancer screening based on population-based registers. These results may serve as high-quality evidence to supplement current screening guidelines for relatives of patients with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.