ReviewPLoS genetics2019
Mouse protein coding diversity: What's left to discover?
Review in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-quality mouse reference genomes reveal the structural complexity of the murine protein-coding landscape.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- A mouse organoid platform for modeling cerebral cortex development and cis-regulatory evolution in vitro.Developmental cell · 2025Article
- ASPEN: Robust detection of allelic dynamics in single cell RNA-seq.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- ASPEN: Robust detection of allelic dynamics in single cell RNA-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Phenogenomic resources immortalized in a panel of wild-derived strains of five species of house mice.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Variation in the Spectrum of New Mutations among Inbred Strains of Mice.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- IFI207, a young and fast-evolving protein, controls retroviral replication via the STING pathway.mBio · 2024Article
- Progress in Vocal Fold Regenerative Biomaterials: An Immunological Perspective.Advanced nanobiomed research · 2022Article
- Extensive variation in the intelectin gene family in laboratory and wild mouse strains.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Review
- The Dichotomous Responses Driven by β-Defensins.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For over a century, mice have been used to model human disease, leading to many fundamental discoveries about mammalian biology and the development of new therapies. Mouse genetics research has been further catalysed by a plethora of genomic resources developed in the last 20 years, including the genome sequence of C57BL/6J and more recently the first draft reference genomes for 16 additional laboratory strains. Collectively, the comparison of these genomes highlights the extreme diversity that exists at loci associated with the immune system, pathogen response, and key sensory functions, which form the foundation for dissecting phenotypic traits in vivo. We review the current status of the mouse genome across the diversity of the mouse lineage and discuss the value of mice to understanding human disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.