ArticleMedicine2019
Theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with stroke: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effectiveness of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Stroke Patients With Upper Limb Impairments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Transcranial electrostimulation with special waveforms enhances upper-limb motor function in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Trial
- The effect of theta burst stimulation (TBS) on aphasia in stroke patients: a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex in stroke survivors-more than motor rehabilitation: A mini-review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUpper limb dysfunction is one of common sequelae of stroke which limits daily activities and decreases quality of life of patients, as well as increasing caregiving burden on families. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is considered to be a beneficial therapy for post-stroke patients with upper limb motor dysfunction, but there is a lack of a high quality evidence. We aim to investigate the effectiveness and safety of TBS for upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with stroke.
methodsThe following databases will be searched: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Technology Periodical Database (VIP) and WanFang Data from the inception to October 2019. All relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using TBS to treat poststroke patients with upper limb motor dysfunction will be included. The primary outcome is Upper Limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UL-FMA). Secondary outcomes will include Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Box and Block Test (BBT), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Grip strength and other scales evaluating the upper limb motor function. Adverse effects will also be evaluated. Two reviewers will screen studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias of included studies independently. Data analysis will be conducted using Review Manager software (RevMan, version 5.3.5) and R software (version 3.6.1).
resultsOur SR will be conducted according to AMSTAR 2.0 and reported in compliance with PRISMA. The findings of this SR will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications or conference presentations.
conclusionOur study will provide evidence for the effectiveness and safety of theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with stroke. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review (SR) does not require formal ethical approval since no privacy health information will be included. The findings of this SR will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications or conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142462.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.