ArticleMedicine2019
Autologous platelet-rich gel and continuous vacuum sealing drainage for the treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcer: Study Protocol.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of platelet-rich plasma combined with negative pressure wound therapy in treating patients with chronic wounds: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- A meta-analysis on the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of Grade 2 and Grade 3 diabetic foot ulcers.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- Autologous platelet rich gel in treatment of lower limb atherosclerotic occlusive disease in diabetic patients.World journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Investigating the feasibility and effectiveness of bacterial culture in negative pressure wound drainage fluid.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis of continuous vacuum sealing drainage for diabetic foot ulcer.Medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch focusing on the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich gel (APRG) and continuous vacuum sealing drainage (CVSD) for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is increasing. Despite increasing knowledge on this theme, its results remain inconsistent. Thus, we will provide insight into the efficacy of APRG and CVSD for patients with DFU.
methodsWe will search electronic databases of MEDILINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, AMED, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to October 1, 2019. No language limitation is utilized to these databases. Two authors will independently perform study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Disagreements between 2 authors will be solved through discussion with a third author.
resultsThe efficacy and safety of APRG and CVSD for patients with DFU will be assessed by the time to complete healing, proportion of ulcers healed within trial period, change of size of ulcer, health-related quality of life, patient length of hospital stay, and adverse events.
conclusionThe results of this study will provide helpful evidence of APRG and CVSD for patients with DFU. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019153289.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.