ArticleMedicine2019
Clinical impact of low-radiation computed tomography coronary angiography diagnosis for coronary artery stenosis: Study Protocol.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study aims to assess the clinic impact of low-radiation computed tomography coronary angiography (LR-CTCA) diagnosis for coronary artery stenosis (CAS).
methodsThis study will comprehensively search the following electronic databases from inception to the present: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, VIP database, WANGFANG, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. All these electronic databases will be searched without language restrictions. All case-controlled studies on assessing the clinical impact of LR-CTCA diagnosis for patients with CAS will be included. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool will be utilized to evaluate the methodological quality for each qualified studies.
resultsWe will assess the clinic impact of LR-CTCA diagnosis for CAS by measuring sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio.
conclusionThe results of this study will summarize the latest evidence of LR-CTCA diagnosis for CAS. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019139336.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.