Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31725479›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2020

The Muscle Cross-sectional Area on MRI of the Shoulder Can Predict Muscle Volume: An MRI Study in Cadavers.

Heath B Henninger, Garrett V Christensen, Carolyn E Taylor, Jun Kawakami, Bradley S Hillyard, Robert Z Tashjian, Peter N Chalmers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Measurement and evaluation of the quadriceps muscle mass in young men based on magnetic resonance imaging].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heath B HenningerH. B. Henninger, G. V. Christensen, C. E. Taylor, J. Kawakami, B. S. Hillyard, R. Z. Tashjian, P. N. Chalmers, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Garrett V ChristensenH. B. Henninger, G. V. Christensen, C. E. Taylor, J. Kawakami, B. S. Hillyard, R. Z. Tashjian, P. N. Chalmers, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Carolyn E TaylorH. B. Henninger, G. V. Christensen, C. E. Taylor, J. Kawakami, B. S. Hillyard, R. Z. Tashjian, P. N. Chalmers, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jun KawakamiH. B. Henninger, G. V. Christensen, C. E. Taylor, J. Kawakami, B. S. Hillyard, R. Z. Tashjian, P. N. Chalmers, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Bradley S HillyardH. B. Henninger, G. V. Christensen, C. E. Taylor, J. Kawakami, B. S. Hillyard, R. Z. Tashjian, P. N. Chalmers, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Robert Z TashjianH. B. Henninger, G. V. Christensen, C. E. Taylor, J. Kawakami, B. S. Hillyard, R. Z. Tashjian, P. N. Chalmers, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Peter N ChalmersH. B. Henninger, G. V. Christensen, C. E. Taylor, J. Kawakami, B. S. Hillyard, R. Z. Tashjian, P. N. Chalmers, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Biomechanics of Reverse Total Shoulder ArthroplastyR01AR067196 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HENNINGER, HEATH BYRON · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle volume is important in shoulder function. It can be used to estimate shoulder muscle balance in health, pathology, and repair and is indicative of strength based on muscle size. Although prior studies have shown that muscle area on two-dimensional (2-D) images correlates with three-dimensional (3-D) muscle volume, they have not provided equations to predict muscle volume from imaging nor validation of the measurements. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We wished to create an algorithm that quickly, accurately, and reliably estimates the volume of the shoulder muscles using cross-sectional area on MR images with low error. Specifically, we wished to (1) determine which MR imaging planes provide the highest correlation between shoulder muscle cross-sectional area and volume; (2) derive equations to predict muscle volume from cross-sectional area and validate their predictive capability; and (3) quantify the reliability of muscle cross-sectional area measurement.

methodsThree-dimensional MRI was performed on 10 cadaver shoulders, with sample size chosen for comparison to prior studies of shoulder muscle volume and in consideration of the cost of comprehensive analysis, followed by dissection for muscle volume measurement via water displacement. From each MR series, 3-D models of the rotator cuff and deltoid muscles were generated, and 2-D slices of these muscle models were selected at defined anatomic landmarks. Linear regression equations were generated to predict muscle volume at the plane(s) with the highest correlation between volume and area and for planes identified in prior studies of muscle volume and area. Volume predictions from MR scans of six different cadaver shoulders were also made, after which they were dissected to quantify muscle volume. This validation population allowed the calculation of the predictive error compared with actual muscle volume. Finally, reliability of measuring muscle areas on MR images was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients for inter-rater reliability, as measured between two observers at a single time point.

resultsThe rotator cuff planes with the highest correlation between volume and area were the sum of the glenoid face and the midpoint of the scapula, and for the deltoid, it was the transverse plane at the top of the greater tuberosity. Water and digital muscle volumes were highly correlated (r ≥ 0.993, error < 4%), and muscle areas correlated highly with volumes (r ≥ 0.992, error < 2%). All correlations had p < 0.001. Muscle volume was predicted with low mean error (< 10%). All intraclass correlation coefficients were > 0.925, suggesting high inter-rater reliability in determining muscle areas from MR images.

conclusionDeltoid and rotator cuff muscle cross-sectional areas can be reliably measured on MRI and predict muscle volumes with low error. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using simple linear equations, 2-D muscle area measurements from common clinical image analysis software can be used to estimate 3-D muscle volumes from MR image data. Future studies should determine if these muscle volume estimations can be used in the evaluation of patient function, changes in shoulder health, and in populations with muscle atrophy. Additionally, these muscle volume estimation techniques can be used as inputs to musculoskeletal models examining kinetics and kinematics of humans that rely on subject-specific muscle architecture.

Indexed as

AgedAlgorithmsAnatomic LandmarksCadaverFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalReproducibility of ResultsShoulder

Identifiers

PMID31725479
PMCPMC7282568
OpenAlexW2986863543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.