Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31725346›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020

Seasonal influenza vaccine uptake and vaccine refusal among pregnant women in France: results from a national survey.

Alexandre Descamps, Odile Launay, Camille Bonnet, Béatrice Blondel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Maternal Vaccination in Pregnancy: An Assessment of Influenza, Pertussis, and COVID-19 Vaccination Rates in Cracow, Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characteristics associated with influenza vaccination uptake in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre DescampsCIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2437-7876
Odile LaunayCIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3242-7247
Camille BonnetObstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), CRESS, INSERM, INRA, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5061-2337
Béatrice BlondelObstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), CRESS, INSERM, INRA, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9367-8317
Inserm · FRHôpital Cochin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women and infants are at high risk for severe influenza and many countries, including France, recommend annual influenza immunization during pregnancy. We aimed to estimate influenza vaccination and refusal rates and assess associated factors among pregnant women during the 2015-16 season in France. We used data from a national representative sample of women who gave birth in March 2016 and were interviewed before hospital discharge (N = 11,752). In the multivariable analysis, robust Poisson regression models were used to study associations with maternal characteristics and prenatal care characteristics. Influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women was 7.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.9-7.9). Only 24.9% (95% CI: 24.2-25.7) of women said that they received a care provider proposal for vaccination and 70.4% (95% CI: 68.7-72.0) of these declined it. Vaccine uptake was associated with low parity (prevalence ratio [PR] = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.4-3.2 for parity 0 vs ≥ 3), high educational level (PR = 2.5; 95% CI: 2.0-3.2), healthcare occupation during pregnancy (PR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.5-2.1) and preexisting conditions at risk for influenza (PR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3-2.2). Women were more frequently vaccinated when their main care provider was a general practitioner. Multiparae women and those with medium or low educational level were significantly more likely than others to decline influenza vaccine after a provider proposal. Influenza vaccine coverage is very low in France, mainly because of infrequent care provider proposals and also frequent women's refusals. Effective interventions should be designed to promote vaccination among medical professionals and reduce vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPregnancy Complications, InfectiousFemaleFranceHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleSeasonsVaccinationVaccination RefusalInfluenza Vaccinesmaternal vaccinationpregnancySeasonal influenzavaccine acceptance

Identifiers

PMID31725346
PMCPMC7227616
OpenAlexW2986868851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.