ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2020
Predicting the Number of Bases to Attain Sufficient Coverage in High-Throughput Sequencing Experiments.
Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-CD: a metagenomic sequencing coverage and depth calculator for target species.Microbiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Embracing Complexity: What Novel Sequencing Methods Are Teaching Us About Herpesvirus Genomic Diversity.Annual review of virology · 2024Review
- Tissue-specific features of the T cell repertoire after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in human and mouse.Science translational medicine · 2023Article
- Performance comparisons between clustering models for reconstructing NGS results from technical replicates.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
For many types of high-throughput sequencing experiments, success in downstream analysis depends on attaining sufficient coverage for individual positions in the genome. For example, when identifying single-nucleotide variants de novo, the number of reads supporting a particular variant call determines our confidence in that variant call. If sequenced reads are distributed uniformly along the genome, the coverage of a nucleotide position is easily approximated by a Poisson distribution, with rate equal to average sequencing depth. Unfortunately, as has become well known, high-throughput sequencing data are never uniform. The numerous factors contributing to variation in coverage have resisted attempts at direct modeling and change along with minor adjustments in the underlying technology. We propose a new nonparametric method to predict the portion of a genome that will attain some specified minimum coverage, as a function of sequencing effort, using information from a shallow sequencing experiment from the same library. Simulations show our approach performs well under an array of distributional assumptions that deviate from uniformity. We applied this approach to estimate coverage at varying depths in single-cell whole-genome sequencing data from multiple protocols. These resulted in highly accurate predictions, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach in analyzing complexity of sequencing libraries and optimizing design of sequencing experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.