ArticleCornea2020
A Fixed-Depth Microneedle Enhances Reproducibility and Safety for Corneal Gene Therapy.
Article in Cornea, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements and challenges in ophthalmic microneedles to treat eye diseases.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Anatomically Guided Non-Viral CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery in the Eye: Overcoming Barriers for Precision Gene Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Novel treatment of infectious keratitis in canine corneas using ultraviolet C (UV-C) light.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Sustained and Efficient Delivery of Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor by the Adeno-associated Virus for the Treatment of Corneal Neovascularization: An Outlook for Its Clinical Translation.Journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Enhanced immune responses to vaccine antigens in the corneal stroma.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023Article
- Ocular Tolerability and Immune Response to Corneal Intrastromal AAV-Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDrug delivery directly to the corneal stroma currently relies on microscopic injections that demonstrate low reproducibility and clinician-dependent variability. With use of biological drugs such as adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors, precise and consistent drug deposition is critical to reduce concerns related to off-target transduction and the host's immune response to the viral capsid and/or transgene-derived product. Therefore, a precise corneal injection (PCI) microneedle was designed to allow accurate depth-specific injections into the corneal stroma in a macroscopic setting.
methodsHigh-frequency ultrasound and confocal microscopy demonstrated the consistent ability to predetermine the precise injection depth using PCI needles of varying sizes. Next, a comparison between a standard 31-G needle and PCI needles was performed in vivo using AAV vector gene delivery.
resultsIntrastromal corneal injections using the PCI microneedle resulted in less vector leakage at the site of injection and fewer anterior chamber penetrations compared with a standard 31-G needle. Although reporter gene expression appeared similar when the vector was administered with either needle type, a trend toward increased vector genomes was noted in the PCI-injected corneas at the experimental conclusion. As hypothesized, corneal perforation resulted in increased detection of AAV vector genomes in nontarget tissues, highlighting the importance of consistency for biological drug applications in the cornea.
conclusionsFurther development of the PCI microneedle is warranted especially for AAV corneal gene therapy and offers the potential to enhance transduction while significantly reducing safety concerns and intraclinician and interclinician injection variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.