ArticleAnnals of surgery2020
Duty Hour Reform and the Outcomes of Patients Treated by New Surgeons.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revision Rates in Cosmetic Plastic Surgery with and without Resident Involvement.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- An acute care surgeon's dilemma: Operative vs. non-operative management of emergency general surgery conditions in patients with recent colorectal cancer treatment.American journal of surgery · 2024Article
- Emergency Surgery, Multimorbidity and Hospital-Free Days: A Retrospective Observational Study.The Journal of surgical research · 2023Observational
- Examining disparities among older multimorbid emergency general surgery patients: An observational study of Medicare beneficiaries.American journal of surgery · 2023Observational
- Exploring ethnic differences in post-discharge patterns of surgical care for older adults admitted with diverticulitis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2023Article
- A dual-institutional study on first-year practice outcomes of pediatric surgeons who trained in the era of work hour restrictions.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Article
- Novel method to link surgical trainee performance data to patient outcomes.American journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Variety and Complexity of Surgical Exposure, Operative Autonomy, and Program Reputation Are Important Factors for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to address the controversy surrounding the effects of duty hour reform on new surgeon performance, we analyzed patients treated by new surgeons following the transition to independent practice. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In 2003, duty hour reform affected all US surgical training programs. Its impact on the performance of new surgeons remains unstudied.
methodsWe studied 30-day mortality among 1,483,074 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing general and orthopedic operations between 1999 and 2003 ("traditional" era) and 2009 and 2013 ("modern" era). The operations were performed by 2762 new surgeons trained before the reform, 2119 new surgeons trained following reform and 15,041 experienced surgeons. We used a difference-in-differences analysis comparing outcomes in matched patients treated by new versus experienced surgeons within each era, controlling for the hospital, operation, and patient risk factors.
resultsTraditional era odds of 30-day mortality among matched patients treated by new versus experienced surgeons were significantly elevated [odds ratio (OR) 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.05, 1.22), P < 0.001). The modern era elevated odds of mortality were not significant [OR 1.06; 95% CI (0.97-1.16), P = 0.239]. Relative performance of new and experienced surgeons with respect to 30-day mortality did not appear to change from the traditional era to the modern era [OR 0.93; 95% CI (0.83-1.05), P = 0.233]. There were statistically significant adverse changes over time in relative performance to experienced surgeons in prolonged length of stay [OR 1.08; 95% CI (1.02-1.15), P = 0.015], anesthesia time [9 min; 95% CI (8-10), P < 0.001], and costs [255USD; 95% CI (2-508), P = 0.049].
conclusionsDuty hour reform showed no significant effect on 30-day mortality achieved by new surgeons compared to their more experienced colleagues. Patients of new surgeons, however, trained after duty hour reform displayed some increases in the resources needed for their care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.